Key takeaways
View moreTesla's current valuation appears moderately overvalued based on its declining profitability metrics (ROA, ROE, ROIC) and high EV/EBITDA ratio compared to industry averages. While the company has significant growth potential in autonomous driving and robotics, these opportunities are highly uncertain and face substantial execution risks. The recent decline in sales and increasing competition further challenge the justification for the current high valuation multiples.
- Tesla's revenue growth continues, but profitability is declining, indicating challenges in managing costs and maintaining margins.
- The company's Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) have decreased significantly and are below industry averages.
- Recent news highlights declining sales, increasing competition, and brand image issues linked to the CEO's political activities, negatively impacting market sentiment.
- Tesla's stock price has experienced significant volatility, with a 33% drop year-to-date and a 45% decline from its January high.
- The company's valuation metrics, such as Enterprise Value to EBITDA and Enterprise Value to Sales, are high compared to industry averages.
- Tesla's future growth is heavily reliant on the successful rollout of Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities and the mass production of Optimus humanoid robots, which carry significant execution risks.
- Escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China pose a significant risk to Tesla's supply chain and profitability.
- Analysts have downgraded Tesla's stock, citing concerns about brand image, declining demand, and tariff concerns.
- Tesla presents a high-risk, high-reward investment profile, with significant growth potential balanced against substantial risks.
- The company's increasing debt-to-equity ratio raises concerns about its long-term solvency.
Evaluation summary
-
Company Overview:
- Tesla, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, sells, and leases electric vehicles and energy generation and storage systems. Key products include the Model 3, Model Y, Model S, Model X, and Cybertruck electric vehicles, as well as Powerwall and Megapack energy storage systems and Solar Roof.
- The company operates through two segments: Automotive and Energy Generation and Storage. The Automotive segment includes the design, development, manufacture, sale, and lease of electric vehicles as well as sales of automotive regulatory credits. The Energy Generation and Storage segment is involved in the design, manufacture, installation, sale, and lease of solar energy generation, energy storage products, and related services and sales of solar energy systems incentives.
- For comparative analysis, General Motors Co. (GM) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) are used as industry peers, and the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is used as a benchmark.
-
Financial Performance:
- Tesla's revenue has shown consistent growth over the past year, with quarterly revenue figures of $21.30 billion (2024-03-31), $25.50 billion (2024-06-30), $25.18 billion (2024-09-30), and $25.71 billion (2024-12-31).
- However, profitability has been declining, as evidenced by shrinking margins. The gross profit margin decreased from 19.84% in Q3 2024 to 16.26% in Q4 2024. Net profit margin also decreased from 8.61% to 9.00% during the same period.
- Return on Assets (ROA) has decreased from 13.93% (2024-03-31) to 6.24% (2024-12-31). Return on Equity (ROE) has decreased from 24.28% to 10.52% during the same period. Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) has decreased from 22.23% to 9.35%. These figures are significantly below industry averages, which are -31.86% for ROA, -52.16% for ROE, and -2807.09% for ROIC.
- Recent news indicates declining sales and increasing competition, which are likely to put further pressure on Tesla's financial performance.
-
Operational Efficiency:
- Tesla's total current assets have increased from $50.54 billion (2024-03-31) to $58.36 billion (2024-12-31), while total current liabilities have decreased from $29.45 billion to $28.82 billion.
- Working capital has increased from $21.08 billion (2024-03-31) to $29.54 billion (2024-12-31), indicating improved short-term liquidity.
- Net operating cash flow has fluctuated, with a low of $242 million (2024-03-31) and a high of $6.26 billion (2024-09-30). In the most recent quarter, it was $4.81 billion (2024-12-31).
- Free cash flow has also been volatile, with a negative value of -$2.54 billion (2024-03-31) and a positive value of $2.03 billion (2024-12-31).
- Capital expenditure was $2.78 billion in the quarter ending December 31, 2024, while depreciation, depletion, and amortization were $1.50 billion.
- The company does not pay dividends.
- The current ratio has improved from 1.72 (2024-03-31) to 2.02 (2024-12-31), but remains below the industry average of 2.74. The quick ratio has improved from 1.17 to 1.61, but remains below the industry average of 2.16.
- The debt-to-equity ratio has increased from 15.40% (2024-03-31) to 18.68% (2024-12-31), indicating increasing leverage.
-
Growth Opportunities:
- Tesla's growth opportunities are heavily tied to its ambitions in autonomous driving and the launch of its robotaxi service.
- The company is investing heavily in R&D, particularly for autonomous driving and battery technology.
- Tesla is expanding its manufacturing facilities, including new Gigafactory facilities in Mexico and China.
- Management is focused on maximizing vehicle production volumes and accelerating development in autonomous driving and robotics (specifically Full Self-Driving and Optimus).
- The company plans to launch a more affordable model in the first half of 2025.
- Recent news indicates that Tesla has launched sales in Saudi Arabia with expectations of selling 10,000 to 15,000 units in the first two years.
-
Recent Developments and Market Sentiment:
- Recent news indicates that Tesla's Q1 2025 deliveries fell to 336,681 vehicles, a 13% year-over-year decline, marking the worst quarterly numbers in over two years.
- Tesla's stock has experienced significant volatility, with a 33% drop year-to-date and a 45% decline from its January high.
- Analysts express concerns about Tesla's brand image and sales performance amid ongoing protests and boycotts, with some suggesting that Musk's political involvement is negatively impacting Tesla's brand and sales.
- Wedbush analyst Dan Ives cut Tesla's price target from $550 to $315, warning of a 'brand crisis' for Tesla due to Musk's political ties and declining demand.
- UBS lowered its price target for Tesla from $225 to $190 due to tariff concerns, while Goldman Sachs maintains a neutral rating with a price target of $260.
- The overall market sentiment surrounding Tesla is predominantly negative.
-
Risks and Threats:
- Tesla faces significant risks, including declining sales, increasing competition, and concerns about CEO Elon Musk's political involvement.
- Escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China pose a significant risk to Tesla's supply chain and profitability, potentially leading to increased costs and reduced sales.
- Increasing competition from both legacy automakers and emerging EV manufacturers, particularly in China, is putting pressure on Tesla's market share and pricing power.
- Potential regulatory hurdles and safety concerns surrounding Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology and robotaxi service could delay or derail its autonomous driving ambitions.
- The company's high debt levels and increasing leverage raise concerns about its long-term solvency.
-
Valuation Analysis:
- Tesla's valuation metrics are high compared to industry averages. The Enterprise Value to EBITDA is 106.05, compared to an industry average of 37.10. The Enterprise Value to Sales is 14.31, compared to an industry average of 23.48.
- Potential catalysts include successful rollout of Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities and the mass production of Optimus humanoid robots.
-
Price Performance:
- Tesla's stock price has been highly volatile. From February 13, 2025, to April 11, 2025, the stock price has fluctuated significantly, with a high of $360.56 and a low of $221.86.
- Year-to-date, TSLA has underperformed the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY), with returns of -33.48% compared to XLY's -14.07%.
- Compared to General Motors and Uber, Tesla's historical performance has been highly volatile.
-
Future Outlook:
- Management projects Tesla becoming the most valuable company in the world by a significant margin, driven primarily by autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots.
- They anticipate at least 50% year-over-year growth in energy storage deployments in 2025.
- Unsupervised FSD is planned for release in Austin in June 2025, with expansion to other regions throughout the year.
- Approximately 10,000 Optimus robots are targeted for production in 2025.
- However, recent news and analyst downgrades suggest a more cautious outlook.
-
Summary:
- Tesla is facing significant challenges, including declining sales, increasing competition, and brand image concerns. While there are potential growth opportunities in autonomous driving and energy storage, the immediate outlook appears challenging, with significant risks associated with trade policies and market dynamics.
- SWOT Analysis:
- Strengths: Innovative technology, strong brand recognition (historically), leading position in EV market.
- Weaknesses: Declining sales, increasing competition, brand image issues, high valuation, volatile stock price.
- Opportunities: Autonomous driving, energy storage, geographic expansion.
- Threats: Trade tensions, regulatory hurdles, competition, macroeconomic conditions.
- Tesla's financial health is mixed, with strong revenue growth but declining profitability and increasing leverage.
- Critical factors for future performance include successful execution of growth plans, cost management, and brand image recovery.
- Areas requiring further monitoring include sales trends, competitive landscape, and regulatory developments.
- Overall, Tesla presents a high-risk, high-reward investment profile. The company's high valuation is difficult to justify given its recent performance and the challenges it faces. While there is significant growth potential, it is balanced against substantial risks. Tesla's position relative to industry trends is uncertain, given the increasing competition and the potential for disruption from new technologies. Potential catalysts include successful rollout of FSD and Optimus, while headwinds include trade tensions, regulatory hurdles, and brand image issues.
Price history
Fundamentals
Insights
- Tesla's revenue growth is impressive, but its profitability is declining, indicating that the company is facing challenges in managing its costs and maintaining its margins.
- The company's heavy investments in research and development and its aggressive growth strategy are putting pressure on profitability.
- Tesla's ability to control its costs and improve its efficiency will be crucial to its future profitability.
- Tesla's strong cash position and increasing working capital indicate a healthy short-term liquidity position.
- However, the company's high debt levels and increasing leverage raise concerns about its long-term solvency, particularly if interest rates rise or economic conditions deteriorate.
- Tesla's future prospects are highly dependent on its ability to successfully execute on its ambitious growth plans, manage its costs, and improve its efficiency.
- The company's ability to generate positive free cash flow will be crucial to its debt repayment capacity, dividend growth potential, and investment in future growth opportunities.
- Tesla's future success will also depend on its ability to navigate a complex regulatory environment and manage a wide range of operational and financial risks.
Analysis
- Revenue
- Tesla's revenue growth has been consistently strong, driven by strong demand for its electric vehicles and energy storage products.
- The company's expansion into new markets and its aggressive growth strategy have contributed to its revenue growth.
- However, Tesla is facing challenges in maintaining its average selling prices, which is putting pressure on its profitability.
- Profitability
- Tesla's profitability has been declining, as its margins have been shrinking.
- The company's heavy investments in research and development and its aggressive growth strategy are putting pressure on profitability.
- Tesla's ability to control its costs and improve its efficiency will be crucial to its future profitability.
- Liquidity
- Tesla's strong cash position and increasing working capital indicate a healthy short-term liquidity position.
- However, the company's reliance on short-term financing to fund its operations could increase its short-term liquidity risk in the future.
- Solvency
- Tesla's high debt levels and increasing leverage raise concerns about its long-term solvency, particularly if interest rates rise or economic conditions deteriorate.
- The company's ability to manage its debt obligations and maintain its profitability will be crucial to its financial flexibility and strategic options in the future.
- Operational Efficiency
- Tesla's operational efficiency has been improving, as evidenced by its declining inventory levels and its ability to control its operating expenses.
- However, the company's high capital expenditures and research and development costs are putting pressure on its profitability.
- Cash Flow Analysis
- Tesla's operating cash flow has been consistently increasing, driven by strong revenue growth and improvements in working capital management.
- However, the company's high capital expenditures and its reliance on debt financing have contributed to its volatile cash flow patterns.
- Tesla's ability to generate positive free cash flow will be crucial to its debt repayment capacity, dividend growth potential, and investment in future growth opportunities.
- Risk Factors
- Tesla's aggressive growth strategy and its reliance on debt financing could lead to higher interest expenses and potential financial distress if its profitability does not keep pace with its debt obligations.
- The company's heavy investments in research and development and its expansion into new markets carry significant execution risks.
- Tesla's reliance on suppliers and potential supply chain disruptions could impact its production and profitability.
- The evolving regulatory landscape around autonomous driving and data privacy could pose challenges to Tesla's growth plans.
- Future Outlook
- Tesla's future prospects are highly dependent on its ability to successfully execute on its ambitious growth plans, manage its costs, and improve its efficiency.
- The company's ability to generate positive free cash flow will be crucial to its debt repayment capacity, dividend growth potential, and investment in future growth opportunities.
- Tesla's future success will also depend on its ability to navigate a complex regulatory environment and manage a wide range of operational and financial risks.
- Profitability
Financial statements
Public filings
- Tesla is a leading innovator in the electric vehicle and renewable energy industries, but faces intense competition and significant operational and financial risks as it scales its business.
- The company's ability to successfully launch new products, manage its supply chain, and navigate a complex regulatory environment will be critical to its future success.
- Tesla's heavy investment in autonomous driving and battery technology development could provide long-term competitive advantages, but also carries substantial near-term costs and risks.
- Macroeconomic factors like interest rates, inflation, and supply chain disruptions pose major challenges to Tesla's growth and profitability, underscoring the cyclical nature of the automotive industry.
- Ongoing legal proceedings and government investigations add further uncertainty and potential liabilities that could impact Tesla's operations and financial performance.
- Overall, Tesla appears well-positioned to capitalize on the transition to electric vehicles and renewable energy, but must effectively execute on its ambitious plans while managing a wide range of operational, financial, and regulatory risks.
Core Business and Operations:
- Tesla designs, develops, manufactures, sells and leases high-performance fully electric vehicles, solar energy generation systems, and energy storage products
- Key products include the Model 3, Model Y, Model S, Model X, and Cybertruck electric vehicles, as well as Powerwall and Megapack energy storage systems and Solar Roof
- Operates two main business segments: automotive and energy generation/storage
- Sells vehicles directly to customers through an international network of company-owned stores and galleries
- Competes with established automakers as well as new entrants in the electric vehicle market
Industry and Market Trends:
- Electric vehicle market is highly competitive and growing, with many established and new automakers entering the space
- Regulatory incentives and policies supporting electric vehicles and renewable energy are important drivers of demand
- Macroeconomic factors like interest rates, inflation, and supply chain constraints can impact vehicle affordability and sales
- Evolving regulations around autonomous driving features and data privacy/security pose challenges
Recent Events:
- Launched the Cybertruck electric pickup truck in late 2023
- Opened new Gigafactory manufacturing facilities in Mexico and China
- Continued ramp-up of battery cell production and development of next-generation vehicle platforms
- Experienced some production delays and declines due to supply chain issues and manufacturing ramp-ups
Risk Factors:
- Ability to successfully launch and ramp production of new products on schedule
- Reliance on suppliers and potential supply chain disruptions
- Macroeconomic conditions and their impact on vehicle demand and affordability
- Evolving regulatory landscape around autonomous driving and data privacy
- Potential product quality and safety issues, including recalls
- Cybersecurity risks and data breaches
Legal Matters:
- Ongoing litigation related to the 2018 CEO performance award and directors' compensation
- Class action lawsuits alleging issues with driver assistance technologies and vehicle defects
- Investigations by government agencies on various operational and compliance matters
Management's Discussion and Analysis:
- Focused on profitable growth through new product introductions, manufacturing capacity expansion, cost reduction, and operational efficiency
- Investing heavily in R&D, particularly for autonomous driving and battery technology
- Generating positive operating cash flow to fund growth, but also relying on debt and equity financing
- Facing headwinds from supply chain constraints, inflation, and macroeconomic uncertainty impacting vehicle demand and affordability
Earnings calls
Earnings Report 2024Q4 (2025-01-29)
Key takeaways
- FSD is the Key Catalyst: The overwhelming focus by both management and analysts on FSD highlights its critical role in Tesla's future growth and valuation. Successful and widespread deployment is paramount.
- Optimus Holds Enormous, but Uncertain, Potential: While management projects massive revenue from Optimus, the timeline and execution remain highly uncertain, representing a significant risk and opportunity.
- Supply Chain Constraints Remain a Bottleneck: Battery production capacity is a major constraint on Tesla's ability to meet demand, impacting both vehicle and energy storage production.
- Regulatory Hurdles Pose Significant Challenges: The regulatory landscape for FSD deployment, particularly in Europe and China, presents a significant obstacle to Tesla's growth plans.
- Aggressive Growth Strategy, but with Risks: Tesla's ambitious growth targets, particularly for FSD and Optimus, are accompanied by significant execution risks and uncertainties.
- Market Sentiment is Highly Positive, but Price May Reflect Future Gains: The extremely optimistic tone from management, while potentially boosting investor confidence, also raises concerns that the current share price may already incorporate much of the anticipated future growth.
- US Manufacturing Competitiveness is a Concern: The analysts' questions regarding US manufacturing capabilities highlight a broader concern about the country's ability to compete in the rapidly evolving AI and robotics sectors.
Focus of management’s prepared remarks
- Record Q4 Deliveries and Model Y Success: Tesla achieved record vehicle deliveries in Q4 2024, with the Model Y becoming the best-selling vehicle globally.
- Focus on Maximizing Volume and Autonomous Technology: Management emphasized a strong focus on maximizing vehicle production volumes and accelerating development in autonomous driving and robotics (specifically Full Self-Driving and Optimus).
- Immense Future Growth Potential: Elon Musk projected Tesla becoming the most valuable company in the world by a significant margin, driven primarily by autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots. He predicted exceptionally high revenue from Optimus.
- Full Self-Driving (FSD) Progress and Monetization: Significant progress in FSD was highlighted, with plans for unsupervised FSD deployment in Austin in June 2025. The potential for substantial asset value increase through FSD monetization was emphasized.
- Optimus Robot Development and Production: Management detailed plans for Optimus robot production, aiming for several thousand units in 2025 and a rapid scaling of production in subsequent years. The potential for massive revenue from Optimus was stressed.
- Energy Storage Growth: Record energy storage deployments were reported, with plans to ramp up production through new Megafactories.
- Cost Reduction and Efficiency: Significant cost reductions were achieved, bringing the cost per car below $35,000. Management highlighted ongoing efforts to improve cost efficiency.
- New Product Launches: The upcoming launch of a more affordable model in the first half of 2025 was confirmed.
- Inventory Management: Tesla successfully reduced finished goods inventory to its lowest level in two years.
Focus of the analyst Q&A
- Unsupervised FSD Rollout: Analysts inquired about the timeline and hurdles for the release of unsupervised FSD in Texas and California, and other regions. Concerns about safety and regulatory approvals were implicit.
- FSD Licensing: Analysts sought information on discussions with other automakers regarding licensing Tesla's FSD technology.
- Optimus Design and Production: Analysts questioned the design finality of Optimus for 2025 production, the timeline for sales, and the anticipated pricing. Concerns about the complexity of scaling production were raised.
- Tesla Semi Production and Revenue Impact: Analysts asked about the status of mass production for the Tesla Semi and its potential revenue contribution.
- Hardware 3 Upgrades: Analysts inquired about the necessity and timeline for upgrading Hardware 3 vehicles, and the associated impact on Tesla's capital expenditures.
- Solar Roof Production: Analysts asked about the status of the solar roof product and whether Tesla had abandoned its development.
- FSD Version 14 Technical Breakthroughs: Analysts sought details on the technical advancements in FSD Version 14.
- Tesla's Strategy to Accelerate Innovation: Analysts asked about the strategies Tesla is employing to accelerate innovation and realize the value of its technology. The question implied a concern that the current share price already reflects much of the anticipated future value.
- LiDAR Technology: Analysts questioned Elon Musk's continued rejection of LiDAR technology for autonomous vehicles.
- US Manufacturing Capabilities for AI: Analysts expressed concern about the US's manufacturing and supply chain capabilities to support the rapid advancement of physical AI, referencing potential vulnerabilities compared to China.
- Robotaxi Deployment: Analysts sought clarification on the nature of the planned robotaxi deployment in Austin, whether it would involve the public using their own vehicles or only Tesla's fleet.
- Eyes-Off Driving Capabilities: Analysts asked about the timeline for enabling "eyes-off" driving capabilities, allowing drivers to perform other tasks while the car is in autonomous mode.
- Impact of EV Mandate Reversal: Analysts inquired about Elon Musk's view on the potential impact of a reversal of the EV mandate on EV adoption in the US.
- Pricing Strategy in Light of FSD Advancements: Analysts asked about Tesla's willingness to sell vehicles at lower margins to increase market penetration, given the advancements in FSD technology.
Summary
-
Financial Performance: Tesla reported record vehicle deliveries in Q4 2024, achieving an annualized rate of nearly 2 million. Model Y was the best-selling vehicle overall for the year. While automotive margins declined quarter-over-quarter due to lower average selling prices (ASPs) and the recognition of FSD revenue in Q3, overall cost per car decreased to below $35,000. Energy storage deployments reached an all-time high for the quarter, driven by Megapack and Powerwall, although sequential growth was limited by supply constraints. Q4 net income was positively impacted by a $600 million mark-to-market benefit from Bitcoin due to a new accounting standard. Free cash flow for Q4 was $2 billion, and $3.6 billion for the full year. Specific comparisons to prior periods and analyst expectations were not explicitly provided in the transcript.
-
Revenue Drivers: The primary revenue drivers were record vehicle deliveries, particularly the Model Y, and all-time high energy storage deployments. Growth in the Greater China market was highlighted as an encouraging trend. Future revenue growth is heavily predicated on the successful rollout of Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities and the mass production of Optimus humanoid robots, with management projecting potentially enormous revenue streams from both. The Tesla Semi is also expected to contribute meaningfully to revenue in the future.
-
Profit Margins and Cost Management: Automotive margins decreased quarter-over-quarter due to lower ASPs and the timing of FSD revenue recognition. However, cost reduction efforts resulted in a cost per car below $35,000. The transition to the new Model Y will temporarily impact margins due to lost production and ramp-up costs. Energy storage margins were impacted by supply constraints. Service and other business margins declined sequentially due to higher service center costs and lower used car profits. Management emphasized ongoing cost reduction efforts and expects margin improvement as production ramps up for the new Model Y and other initiatives. Future margin projections were not explicitly provided, but management expressed confidence in future growth.
-
Guidance and Outlook: Management provided highly optimistic forward-looking statements, projecting "ballistic" growth in the coming years driven by FSD and Optimus. They anticipate at least 50% year-over-year growth in energy storage deployments in 2025. Unsupervised FSD is planned for release in Austin in June 2025, with expansion to other regions throughout the year. Approximately 10,000 Optimus robots are targeted for production in 2025. Capital expenditures are expected to be flat year-over-year in 2025. Significant risks include regulatory hurdles for FSD deployment, supply chain constraints (particularly for battery packs), and potential tariffs. The macroeconomic environment is acknowledged as uncertain.
-
Strategic Initiatives: Key strategic initiatives include the rollout of unsupervised FSD, mass production of Optimus, and ramping up production of the Tesla Semi and energy storage products. The company is also focused on cost reduction, expanding its product lineup (including a more affordable model in the first half of 2025), and localizing its supply chain. Management highlighted its leadership in real-world AI and its ability to scale manufacturing to massive volumes as key competitive advantages.
-
Management Commentary: Management expressed extremely high confidence in the future prospects of the company, particularly regarding FSD and Optimus. The overall tone was highly optimistic, bordering on exuberant. Elon Musk repeatedly emphasized the transformative potential of FSD and Optimus, predicting enormous revenue growth and market dominance. He also stressed the importance of real-world AI and the challenges of scaling manufacturing.
-
Industry and Market Conditions: Management acknowledged a highly competitive BEV market, particularly in Greater China. They also noted the challenges of regulatory hurdles for FSD deployment in various markets. The need for increased battery production capacity was highlighted as a current constraint on growth. The potential impact of tariffs on profitability was also mentioned. Management expressed confidence that sustainable transport is inevitable and that Tesla is well-positioned to capitalize on this trend.
News evaluation
Sentiment rating:Very Negative
Apr 13, 2025Summary
The overall sentiment surrounding Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) is predominantly negative. The company is grappling with declining sales, increasing competition, and a brand image tarnished by CEO Elon Musk's political activities. Recent financial results have been disappointing, and analysts are expressing concerns about Tesla's ability to maintain its market leadership. While there are potential growth opportunities in autonomous driving and energy storage, the immediate outlook appears challenging, with significant risks associated with trade policies and market dynamics. The stock's high valuation relative to its recent performance raises further questions about its investment appeal.
Key takeways
Tesla is facing significant challenges, including declining sales, increasing competition, and concerns about CEO Elon Musk's political involvement.
Tesla's future growth potential is heavily tied to its ambitions in autonomous driving and the launch of its robotaxi service, but success is uncertain.
Analysts are divided on Tesla's stock, reflecting its battleground status amid concerns over demand and Musk's political involvement.
News
Tesla's Q1 2025 deliveries fell to 336,681 vehicles, a 13% year-over-year decline, marking the worst quarterly numbers in over two years.
Tesla's stock has experienced significant volatility, with a 33% drop year-to-date and a 45% decline from its January high.
Tesla has launched sales in Saudi Arabia with expectations of selling 10,000 to 15,000 units in the first two years, while suspending online sales of certain models in China due to escalating tariffs.
Analysis
Analysts express concerns about Tesla's brand image and sales performance amid ongoing protests and boycotts, with some suggesting that Musk's political involvement is negatively impacting Tesla's brand and sales.
Wedbush analyst Dan Ives cut Tesla's price target from $550 to $315, warning of a 'brand crisis' for Tesla due to Musk's political ties and declining demand.
UBS lowered its price target for Tesla from $225 to $190 due to tariff concerns, while Goldman Sachs maintains a neutral rating with a price target of $260.
Trends
Tesla's stock has been on a downward trend, declining nearly 45% since mid-December 2024, reflecting significant market volatility and investor concerns.
Tesla's sales in Europe have been declining, with a 49% drop in January and February 2025, indicating increasing competition and potential brand perception issues.
Analysts are increasingly concerned about the impact of CEO Elon Musk's political involvement on Tesla's brand and sales, with some suggesting that it has alienated a portion of the company's customer base.
Risk factors
Escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China pose a significant risk to Tesla's supply chain and profitability, potentially leading to increased costs and reduced sales.
Increasing competition from both legacy automakers and emerging EV manufacturers, particularly in China, is putting pressure on Tesla's market share and pricing power.
Potential regulatory hurdles and safety concerns surrounding Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology and robotaxi service could delay or derail its autonomous driving ambitions.
- Dawn Project Safety tests reveal that Tesla Full Self-Driving illegally overtakes stopped school buses and runs down children crossing the road
- U.S. District Court Judge Once Again Denies Tesla's Request to Block Matthews International from Selling Its Innovative Dry Battery Electrode Solutions to Others
Comparative analysis
Benchmarks (as of 2025-04-11)
-
Performance Comparison:
- Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has shown mixed performance compared to the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Over the past year, TSLA has significantly outperformed XLY, with returns of 56.25% versus 9.9%. However, year-to-date, TSLA has underperformed, with returns of -33.48% compared to XLY's -14.07%. Over a three-year period, TSLA has also underperformed, with returns of -23.15% versus XLY's 9.23%. These fluctuations indicate that TSLA's performance can be highly variable compared to the broader consumer discretionary sector.
-
Risk and Return Analysis:
- The annualized returns show that TSLA has provided higher returns over the past one and two years but lower returns over the past three years. Specifically, TSLA's one-year annualized return is 56.25% compared to XLY's 9.9%, and the two-year annualized return is 16.78% compared to XLY's 14.59%. However, the three-year annualized return for TSLA is -8.4% compared to XLY's 2.99%.
- TSLA's annualized volatility has consistently been higher than XLY's, indicating that TSLA is a more volatile investment. For example, in Q1 2025, TSLA's volatility reached 113.98%, while XLY's was 48.69%. This higher volatility suggests that TSLA's price experiences more significant swings than the broader consumer discretionary sector.
- The maximum drawdown for TSLA was -73.63% on 01/03/2023, while the maximum drawdown for XLY was -39.67% on 12/28/2022. This indicates that TSLA carries a higher risk profile, with the potential for substantial losses from previous peaks.
-
Risk-Adjusted Performance:
- The Sharpe Ratio for TSLA has been generally lower and more volatile than that of XLY, indicating that TSLA offers a less favorable risk-adjusted return. For instance, as of 2025-04-08, TSLA's Sharpe Ratio was 0.7, while XLY's was 0.04. This suggests that XLY provides better returns relative to the risk taken.
- TSLA's beta has consistently been above 1, indicating that it is more sensitive to market movements than XLY. As of 2025-04-11, TSLA's beta was 2.37, while XLY's beta was 1.12. This higher beta suggests that TSLA's price movements are more amplified compared to the broader consumer discretionary sector.
-
Overall Assessment:
- Based on the analysis, TSLA presents a higher-risk, higher-reward profile compared to XLY. While TSLA has shown periods of significant outperformance, it also exhibits greater volatility, larger drawdowns, and a less favorable risk-adjusted return as indicated by its Sharpe Ratio. The higher beta suggests that TSLA is more sensitive to overall market movements.
- A significant trend is TSLA's high volatility compared to XLY, which remains consistent throughout the analyzed period. This suggests that TSLA's stock price is subject to more pronounced swings, making it a potentially riskier investment. Investors should consider their risk tolerance and investment horizon when evaluating TSLA relative to the broader consumer discretionary sector represented by XLY.
Peers Price History(as of 2025-04-11)
-
Performance Comparison:
- Tesla's historical performance has been highly volatile compared to General Motors and Uber. Over the past year, Tesla has significantly outperformed both General Motors and Uber, with a return of 56.25% compared to 3.22% and -1.53%, respectively. However, over longer periods such as 2 and 3 years, Tesla's performance has been mixed, underperforming Uber significantly. For instance, over 3 years, Tesla's return was -23.15% compared to Uber's 121.18%.
- Tesla's performance is inconsistent relative to its peers, showing periods of significant outperformance (e.g., 1 year) and underperformance (e.g., 3 years). This inconsistency suggests that Tesla's stock is more sensitive to market conditions and company-specific events.
-
Risk and Return Analysis:
- Tesla's annualized returns have been higher over the past year (56.25%) but lower over 2 and 3 years compared to Uber. General Motors has provided lower but more stable returns.
- Tesla's annualized volatility has been significantly higher than General Motors, indicating greater price swings. For example, as of Q1 2025, Tesla's annualized volatility was 113.98% compared to General Motors' 53.18%. Uber's volatility is also high, but generally lower than Tesla's.
- Tesla's maximum drawdown was -73.63% on 01/03/2023, which is more severe than General Motors' -58.96% and Uber's -66.32%. This indicates that Tesla carries a higher risk of significant losses from peak values.
-
Risk-Adjusted Performance:
- Tesla's Sharpe Ratio has been volatile, with periods of negative values indicating poor risk-adjusted returns. As of Q1 2025, Tesla's Sharpe ratio is 0.86, which is better than General Motors' 0.2 and Uber's 0.09, suggesting a better risk-adjusted return in the most recent period.
- Tesla's Beta has consistently been above 1, indicating higher sensitivity to market movements compared to General Motors and Uber. As of Q1 2025, Tesla's beta is 2.37, indicating it is significantly more volatile than the market.
-
Overall Assessment:
- Tesla presents a high-risk, high-reward profile compared to General Motors and Uber. While it has shown potential for significant returns, it also carries a higher risk of substantial drawdowns and greater volatility. General Motors offers a more conservative investment option with lower volatility and more stable returns. Uber, while also volatile, has demonstrated strong returns over certain periods, particularly in the longer term.
- A key trend is Tesla's increasing beta, suggesting that its sensitivity to market movements is growing. This could be a concern for risk-averse investors. Additionally, Tesla's high volatility and significant drawdowns indicate that it may be more suitable for investors with a higher risk tolerance and a longer investment horizon.
Peers Fundamentals(as of 2024-12-31)
-
Market Position and Size:
- TSLA is a dominant player in the electric vehicle market with a market capitalization significantly larger than its peers, General Motors (GM) and Uber Technologies (UBER).
- TSLA's market cap is significantly larger than its revenue, EBITDA, and net income, suggesting investors are placing a high premium on its future growth potential.
- This large market cap reflects investor confidence in TSLA's ability to capitalize on the growing electric vehicle market.
-
Profitability and Efficiency:
- TSLA exhibits relatively strong profitability compared to its peers, with higher Gross Profit Margin, EBITDA Margin, and Net Profit Margin than GM, but lower than UBER.
- All three companies have significantly higher profitability metrics than the industry average.
- TSLA's profitability is strong considering its size and revenue, indicating its ability to generate profits despite its large market cap.
- TSLA's efficiency in generating returns from its assets, equity, total capital, and invested capital is relatively strong compared to its peers, but not as high as UBER's.
-
Financial Health and Stability:
- TSLA demonstrates strong liquidity and a low level of debt compared to its peers, as evidenced by its higher Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, and lower Total Debt to Total Equity Ratio and Debt / EBITDA.
- This suggests a strong financial position with a low risk of financial distress.
-
Valuation and Market Perception:
- TSLA trades at a premium valuation compared to its peers and industry standards, reflecting investor optimism about its future growth potential and its position as a leader in the electric vehicle market.
- This premium valuation is reflected in its high Enterprise Value To Sales, Enterprise Value To EBITDA, Price To Earnings, Price to Book Ratio, and Price To Sales Ratio.
-
Cash Flow and Capital Management:
- TSLA's cash flow generation is relatively strong compared to its peers, with higher Net Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow than UBER, but lower than GM.
- TSLA's capital expenditure is relatively high compared to its peers, indicating its focus on investing in future growth.
- Despite its large market cap, TSLA is able to generate a relatively high level of free cash flow.
-
Growth and Future Prospects:
- TSLA exhibits consistently higher growth in sales/revenue, EBITDA, and free cash flow compared to the peer group average, suggesting it is outpacing its peers in terms of overall business growth.
- TSLA's 5-year CAGR figures are significantly higher than its 3-year CAGR figures for sales/revenue, EBITDA, and free cash flow, indicating accelerating growth over the past five years.
- This strong growth suggests that TSLA is gaining market share and expanding its operations, indicating a positive outlook for its future prospects.
-
Potential for Investment:
- TSLA is an attractive investment for investors who are bullish on the future of the electric vehicle market.
- Its strong growth, high valuation, and low debt suggest it is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for electric vehicles.
- However, investors should consider TSLA's lower profitability and earnings per share compared to its peers, and its lower cash flow generation compared to UBER.
-
Key Risks and Considerations:
- TSLA's high valuation is a significant risk, as it is possible that the market is overestimating its future growth potential.
- TSLA's lower profitability and earnings per share compared to its peers suggest that it may need to improve its efficiency and cost management to further enhance its financial performance.
- TSLA's dependence on government subsidies and incentives for its electric vehicle sales could be a risk if these policies change.
-
Overall Assessment:
- TSLA is a financially strong company with a dominant market position in the electric vehicle market.
- Its strong growth, high valuation, and low debt suggest a positive outlook for its future prospects.
- However, investors should be aware of the risks associated with its high valuation, lower profitability compared to peers, and dependence on government subsidies.