Thematic evaluation
Back to company overview

International Business Machines Corp. (IBM)

September 06, 2024

Compared to: Infosys Ltd. (INFY) | Accenture Plc (ACN) | Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK)

Our reasoning

IBM appears moderately undervalued based on its strong financial performance, expanding margins, and growth prospects in hybrid cloud and AI. The company's valuation metrics are below industry averages, while its strategic positioning and potential for accelerated growth in high-value areas suggest room for valuation expansion. However, risks such as increasing long-term debt and integration challenges temper the undervaluation assessment.

Key takeaways
  • IBM is a well-positioned technology leader with a strong financial performance, robust cash flow generation, and a clear strategic focus on hybrid cloud and AI.
  • The company's growth opportunities are significant, driven by increasing enterprise demand for transformative technologies.
  • IBM's valuation metrics are currently attractive, suggesting potential undervaluation.
  • The company's stock price has consistently outperformed its benchmark and peers, indicating a strong track record of performance.
  • Investors should carefully consider the company's risks, including potential financial leverage, integration challenges, and intense competition.
Undervalued
Ask a question about International Business Machines Corp. (IBM)
Evaluation summary

  1. Company Overview:

    • IBM is a global technology company that provides a wide range of software, consulting, and infrastructure solutions and services primarily to enterprise clients.
    • The company's key products and services include hybrid cloud platforms, AI and analytics software, consulting services, and mission-critical infrastructure like IBM Z and Power Systems.
    • IBM's target market is primarily large enterprises across various industries, including financial services, healthcare, government, and telecommunications.
    • We are using the Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) as a benchmark for price performance comparison and Accenture Plc (ACN) and Infosys Ltd. (INFY) as industry peers for comparative analysis.

  2. Financial Performance:

    • IBM has demonstrated consistent revenue growth in recent quarters, driven by strong demand for its hybrid cloud and AI solutions.
    • The company's profitability is strong, with positive net income and expanding margins.
    • IBM's profitability ratios (ROA, ROE, ROTC, ROIC) are significantly higher than the industry average, indicating efficient asset utilization and strong returns on capital.
    • Compared to its peers, IBM has consistently outperformed both ACN and INFY over the past three years, with significantly higher annualized returns. However, IBM's performance has been more volatile than ACN's, particularly in the short term.

  3. Operational Efficiency:

    • IBM's balance sheet analysis reveals a strong cash position and decreasing short-term debt, suggesting a healthy liquidity position and ability to meet short-term obligations.
    • The company's working capital analysis indicates improved asset utilization efficiency, with decreasing receivables and inventories, contributing to profitability.
    • IBM's operating cash flow trends are positive, indicating strong short-term liquidity.
    • The company's free cash flow generation is robust, supporting long-term solvency and providing financial flexibility.
    • IBM's capital expenditures are decreasing, suggesting a potential shift in investment priorities or a slowdown in growth.
    • The company's dividend and share repurchase sustainability analysis indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
    • Compared to its peers, IBM's Sharpe Ratio has generally been lower than ACN's and INFY's, suggesting that IBM's risk-adjusted returns have been lower. However, IBM's Sharpe Ratio has been increasing in recent quarters, indicating that its risk-adjusted returns are improving.

  4. Growth Opportunities:

    • IBM is aggressively investing in innovation and strategic acquisitions to capitalize on growing enterprise demand for transformative technologies like generative AI.
    • The company's M&A strategy is active, with significant investments in acquisitions, including the recent acquisition of HashiCorp.
    • IBM's R&D pipeline is focused on advancing hybrid cloud and AI capabilities, aligning with industry innovation trends.
    • The company's capital allocation strategies are aligned with its strategic goals, prioritizing investments in growth initiatives and shareholder returns.
    • Management's historical execution of strategic plans has been successful, as evidenced by the company's consistent revenue growth and margin expansion.

  5. Risks and Threats:

    • The increasing long-term debt raises concerns about potential financial leverage and its impact on future solvency.
    • The company's aggressive acquisition strategy could lead to integration challenges and higher debt levels.
    • IBM faces a range of operational, financial, and legal/regulatory risks that could impact its performance, including macroeconomic uncertainty, integration challenges, pension plan volatility, and ongoing litigation.
    • The company's competitive landscape is intense, with major players like Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Oracle, and Accenture vying for market share.

  6. Valuation Analysis:

    • IBM's valuation metrics, such as P/E and EV/EBITDA, are currently below the industry average, suggesting potential undervaluation.
    • Compared to its peers, IBM's valuation metrics are more attractive, indicating a potential opportunity for investors.
    • The company's strong financial performance, growth opportunities, and strategic focus on hybrid cloud and AI are potential catalysts for future valuation growth.

  7. Price Performance:

    • IBM's stock price has consistently outperformed both XLK and its peers over the past three years, with significantly higher annualized returns.
    • IBM's stock price has been more volatile than ACN's, but less volatile than INFY's.
    • IBM's maximum drawdown has been lower than its peers, indicating that its stock price has been more resilient to market downturns.

  8. Future Outlook:

    • Management's guidance for full-year revenue growth is in line with the mid-single-digit model, at the low end.
    • The company has raised its software revenue growth outlook to high-single-digits and consulting revenue growth to low-single-digits for the year.
    • Analyst estimates for IBM's future performance are generally positive, with consensus trends indicating continued revenue growth and margin expansion.

  9. Summary:

    • IBM is a well-positioned technology leader with a strong financial performance, robust cash flow generation, and a clear strategic focus on hybrid cloud and AI.
    • The company's growth opportunities are significant, driven by increasing enterprise demand for transformative technologies.
    • However, IBM faces a range of risks, including potential financial leverage, integration challenges, and intense competition.
    • The company's valuation metrics are currently attractive, suggesting potential undervaluation.
    • IBM's stock price has consistently outperformed its benchmark and peers, indicating a strong track record of performance.
    • The company's future outlook is positive, with management guidance and analyst estimates pointing towards continued growth and profitability.
    • Overall, IBM appears to be a solid investment with a good track record of performance, strong growth potential, and attractive valuation. However, investors should carefully consider the company's risks and monitor its financial leverage and integration challenges.
Peer fundamentals 
Fundamentals
Insights
  • IBM is experiencing strong revenue growth, driven by demand for its hybrid cloud and AI solutions.
  • The company is effectively managing costs, leading to margin expansion and improved profitability.
  • IBM's profitability ratios are significantly higher than the industry average, indicating efficient asset utilization and strong returns on capital.
  • The company's strong cash position and decreasing short-term debt suggest a healthy liquidity position and ability to meet short-term obligations.
  • The increasing long-term debt raises concerns about potential financial leverage and its impact on future solvency.
  • The company's aggressive acquisition strategy could lead to integration challenges and higher debt levels.
  • IBM's financial performance is expected to remain positive in the coming quarters, driven by its strong business fundamentals and strategic focus.
Analysis
  • Revenue - IBM's revenue is increasing, driven by strong demand for its hybrid cloud and AI solutions. - The company's strategic initiatives in these areas are contributing to its revenue growth. - The company is effectively managing costs, leading to margin expansion and improved profitability.
    • Profitability
      • IBM's profitability is strong, with positive net income and expanding margins.
      • The company's profitability ratios (ROA, ROE, ROTC, ROIC) are significantly higher than the industry average, indicating efficient asset utilization and strong returns on capital.
    • Liquidity
      • IBM's strong cash position and decreasing short-term debt suggest a healthy liquidity position and ability to meet short-term obligations.
      • The company's operating cash flow trends are positive, indicating strong short-term liquidity.
    • Solvency
      • The increasing long-term debt raises concerns about potential financial leverage and its impact on future solvency.
      • However, the company's strong cash flow generation and profitability provide a buffer against potential risks.
      • The company's debt/EBITDA ratio is below the industry average, suggesting a manageable level of debt relative to earnings.
    • Operational Efficiency
      • The decreasing receivables and inventories suggest improved asset utilization efficiency, which contributes to profitability.
      • The company is effectively controlling operating expenses, as evidenced by the decrease in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
    • Cash Flow Analysis
      • IBM's free cash flow generation is robust, supporting long-term solvency and providing financial flexibility.
      • The company's capital expenditures are decreasing, suggesting a potential shift in investment priorities or a slowdown in growth.
      • The company's acquisition strategy is active, with significant investments in acquisitions.
    • Risk Factors
      • The increasing long-term debt raises concerns about potential financial leverage and its impact on future solvency.
      • The decreasing provision for risks and charges warrants monitoring for potential financial leverage and risk management challenges.
      • The company's aggressive acquisition strategy could lead to integration challenges and higher debt levels.
    • Future Outlook
      • IBM's financial performance is expected to remain positive in the coming quarters, driven by its strong business fundamentals and strategic focus.
      • The company's financial flexibility will be influenced by its ability to manage debt levels and maintain strong cash flow generation.
      • Key metrics to monitor include free cash flow generation, debt levels, asset utilization efficiency, and dividend growth.
Most recent earnings report
Financial statements 
All public filings
Comparative Analysis
Benchmarks (as of 2024-09-04)
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK)
  • Performance Comparison:
    • IBM has consistently outperformed XLK over all periods, with particularly strong outperformance in the 3-month and 3-year periods. This suggests that IBM has been a strong performer in recent years.
    • IBM's performance has been more consistent than XLK's, with fewer periods of underperformance.
  • Risk and Return Analysis:
    • IBM has provided higher annualized returns than XLK over all periods. This suggests that IBM has been a more profitable investment.
    • IBM has been less volatile than XLK, with lower annualized volatility. This suggests that IBM is a less risky investment.
    • IBM's maximum drawdown of 17.12% is significantly lower than XLK's maximum drawdown of 33.56%. This indicates that IBM has been more resilient to market downturns and has a lower risk profile.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:
    • XLK has offered a better risk-adjusted return than IBM, with a consistently higher Sharpe ratio. This suggests that XLK has been a more efficient investment.
    • IBM's beta of consistently below 1 indicates that it is less sensitive to market movements than XLK. This suggests that IBM is a less risky investment.
  • Overall Assessment:
    • IBM has consistently outperformed XLK in terms of returns and volatility, indicating that it has been a more profitable and less risky investment. However, XLK has offered a better risk-adjusted return, as evidenced by its higher Sharpe ratio.
    • IBM's lower beta suggests that it is less risky than XLK, making it a potentially attractive investment for investors seeking lower volatility.
    • Overall, IBM appears to be a solid investment with strong performance and a lower risk profile. However, investors should consider XLK if they prioritize risk-adjusted returns.
Peers Price History(as of 2024-09-04)
Infosys Ltd. (INFY)Accenture Plc (ACN)
  • Performance Comparison: IBM has consistently outperformed both ACN and INFY over the past three years, with significantly higher annualized returns. This outperformance is particularly evident in the longer-term periods, such as the 2-year and 3-year returns. However, it is important to note that IBM's performance has been more volatile than ACN's, particularly in the short term.
  • Risk and Return Analysis: IBM has provided higher annualized returns than ACN and INFY over the past three years. However, IBM's annualized volatility has been higher than ACN's, but lower than INFY's. This suggests that IBM's stock price is more sensitive to market fluctuations than ACN's, but less sensitive than INFY's. IBM's maximum drawdown of 18.13% is significantly lower than ACN's 39.69% and INFY's 42.52%, indicating that IBM's stock price has been more resilient to market downturns.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance: IBM's Sharpe Ratio has generally been lower than ACN's and INFY's, suggesting that IBM's risk-adjusted returns have been lower. However, IBM's Sharpe Ratio has been increasing in recent quarters, indicating that its risk-adjusted returns are improving. IBM's beta has generally been below 1, while ACN's and INFY's have been above 1. This suggests that IBM's stock price is less sensitive to market movements than ACN's and INFY's, making it a less risky investment.
  • Overall Assessment: IBM has consistently outperformed its peers in terms of annualized returns, but it has also been more volatile. While IBM's maximum drawdown has been lower than its peers, its Sharpe Ratio has been lower, suggesting that its risk-adjusted returns have been lower. IBM's beta suggests that it is a less risky investment than ACN and INFY, as its stock price is less sensitive to market movements. Overall, IBM appears to be a solid investment with a good track record of performance, but its volatility and risk-adjusted returns are areas to monitor.
Peers Fundamentals(as of 2024-06-30)
Infosys Ltd. (INFY)Accenture Plc (ACN)

  1. Market Position and Size:

    • IBM is a large player in the technology services sector, with a market capitalization of 188016.0, placing it between its peers Accenture Plc (ACN) at 215470.0 and Infosys Ltd. (INFY) at 95747.7.
    • IBM's market cap is roughly proportional to its revenue, EBITDA, and net income, suggesting that investors are valuing it in line with its financial performance compared to its peers.

  2. Profitability and Efficiency:

    • IBM exhibits strong profitability, consistently outperforming its peers and the industry in gross profit margin, EBITDA margin, and net profit margin.
    • However, IBM's efficiency in generating returns is mixed. While it outperforms the industry average in most return metrics, it lags behind its peers, particularly in ROA, ROTC, and ROIC.

  3. Financial Health and Stability:

    • IBM's liquidity position is relatively weak compared to its peers and the industry, as indicated by its low current and quick ratios.
    • IBM's high debt levels pose a significant risk to its financial stability and limit its ability to invest in growth opportunities or weather economic downturns.

  4. Valuation and Market Perception:

    • IBM's valuation metrics present a mixed picture. While its EV/Sales and P/B ratios suggest a premium valuation compared to peers and the industry, its EV/EBITDA, P/E, and P/S ratios indicate a discount valuation.
    • This suggests that investors are cautiously optimistic about IBM's future prospects, but may be concerned about its profitability and earnings growth potential.

  5. Cash Flow and Capital Management:

    • IBM's cash flow generation strength is moderate compared to its peers. While it generates a reasonable amount of cash flow, it lags behind Accenture in terms of efficiency.
    • IBM's high capital expenditure suggests a focus on growth or expansion, but its lower free cash flow generation compared to Accenture raises concerns about its ability to sustain this investment.

  6. Growth and Future Prospects:

    • IBM's growth trends show a mixed picture. While it has shown strong growth in net income and basic earnings per share, its revenue growth has been consistently lower than the peer group average.
    • This suggests that IBM has been able to improve its profitability, but its revenue growth is slowing down. This could be a potential red flag, as it may indicate that IBM's growth is not sustainable in the long term.

  7. Potential for Investment:

    • IBM's investment attractiveness is mixed. While it exhibits strong profitability and a significant amount of liquid assets, its slower revenue growth, high debt levels, and lower efficiency in generating returns raise concerns about its long-term sustainability.
    • Its valuation metrics suggest that investors are cautiously optimistic about its future prospects, but may be concerned about its profitability and earnings growth potential.

  8. Key Risks and Considerations:

    • IBM's high debt levels pose a significant risk to its financial stability and limit its ability to invest in growth opportunities or weather economic downturns.
    • IBM's slower revenue growth raises concerns about its ability to maintain its market share and compete effectively in the long term.
    • IBM's lower efficiency in generating returns compared to its peers suggests that it may need to improve its asset utilization and capital allocation strategies to enhance its overall efficiency and returns.

  9. Overall Assessment:

    • IBM is a large player in the technology services sector with a strong brand and a history of innovation. However, its slower revenue growth, high debt levels, and lower efficiency in generating returns compared to its peers raise concerns about its ability to maintain its market share and compete effectively in the long term.
    • While IBM exhibits strong profitability and a significant amount of liquid assets, its overall financial health is mixed. Investors should carefully consider these risks and opportunities before making any investment decisions.