Thematic evaluation
Back to company overview

Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)

September 06, 2024

Compared to: The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | Tractor Supply Co. (TSCO) | Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY)

Our reasoning

Lowe's current valuation appears fair, balancing its strong market position and growth potential against risks such as high debt levels and macroeconomic uncertainties. The company's valuation multiples are in line with industry peers, and its strategic initiatives, particularly in the Pro customer segment and omnichannel capabilities, provide potential for future growth that seems adequately reflected in the current stock price.

Key takeaways
  • Lowe's is a financially sound company with a strong track record of growth and profitability, but its growth rate has slowed in recent quarters due to macroeconomic headwinds.
  • The company's "Total Home" strategy, omnichannel capabilities, and investments in technology are expected to drive future growth, but its high debt levels and potential challenges in maintaining profitability are key risks.
  • LOW's operational efficiency is generally in line with HD, but it lags behind TSCO, which has demonstrated stronger cash flow generation and lower debt levels.
  • The company's stock price has generally outperformed the benchmark XLY over the past three years, but it has been more volatile than XLY, suggesting a higher risk profile.
  • Overall, LOW is a well-positioned company with growth potential, but investors should be aware of the risks and threats associated with the company and carefully consider their risk tolerance and investment goals before making any investment decisions.
Fairly valued
Ask a question about Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)
Evaluation summary

  1. Company Overview:

    • Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is a leading home improvement retailer operating in the United States. The company's business model revolves around selling a wide range of home improvement products and services to both professional contractors (Pro customers) and individual homeowners (DIY consumers).
    • LOW's product offerings include appliances, hardware, lumber, lawn and garden, kitchens and baths, flooring, and more. The company's revenue is primarily generated through its extensive network of physical stores, complemented by its growing online presence.
    • LOW's target market encompasses a broad range of consumers, from professional contractors seeking high-quality materials and tools to homeowners undertaking DIY projects or renovations. The company caters to these diverse needs through its product selection, pricing strategies, and customer service initiatives.
    • For comparative analysis, we will be using the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) as a benchmark and Tractor Supply Co. (TSCO) and The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) as industry peers.

  2. Financial Performance:

    • LOW has demonstrated strong financial performance in recent years, with consistent revenue growth and profitability. However, the company's growth rate has slowed in recent quarters, reflecting the challenging macroeconomic environment.
    • Revenue growth has been driven by the company's "Total Home" strategy, which focuses on enhancing its omnichannel capabilities, improving its Pro customer offerings, and expanding localization efforts.
    • LOW's profitability remains strong, as evidenced by its high return on average assets (ROA), return on average total capital (ROTC), and return on average invested capital (ROIC). However, these ratios have been declining in recent quarters, suggesting potential challenges in maintaining profitability.
    • Compared to its peers, LOW's profitability is generally in line with HD, but it lags behind TSCO, which has consistently demonstrated higher profitability metrics.

  3. Operational Efficiency:

    • LOW's balance sheet analysis reveals a strong liquidity position, with healthy current and quick ratios. However, these ratios are below the industry average, suggesting potential challenges in meeting short-term obligations.
    • The company's working capital management has been efficient, with a consistent trend of positive working capital. However, there are opportunities to optimize inventory management and reduce accounts payable days to further enhance efficiency.
    • LOW's cash flow from operations has been robust, enabling the company to invest in its business and return capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
    • The company's asset quality is generally good, with a low level of goodwill and intangible assets. However, the company's high level of debt is a concern, as it increases financial leverage and exposes the company to potential risks.
    • LOW's free cash flow margin has been increasing, indicating improved efficiency in generating cash from operations. However, the company's capital expenditures have been declining, which could limit future growth opportunities.
    • Compared to its peers, LOW's operational efficiency is generally in line with HD, but it lags behind TSCO, which has demonstrated stronger cash flow generation and lower debt levels.

  4. Growth Opportunities:

    • LOW has identified several growth opportunities, including expanding its omnichannel capabilities, enhancing its Pro customer offerings, and expanding into new markets.
    • The company's "Total Home" strategy is a key driver of growth, as it aims to provide a comprehensive range of home improvement solutions to meet the evolving needs of its customers.
    • LOW's investments in technology and digital platforms are expected to enhance its customer experience and drive sales growth.
    • The company's focus on expanding its Pro customer segment is a strategic move to capitalize on the growing demand for professional home improvement services.
    • LOW's management has a track record of successfully executing strategic plans, as evidenced by the company's consistent growth and profitability.

  5. Risks and Threats:

    • LOW faces several risks and threats, including intense competition, macroeconomic uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, and cybersecurity threats.
    • The company's high debt levels are a significant risk factor, as they increase financial leverage and expose the company to potential risks.
    • The company's reliance on non-cash items to boost earnings is another risk factor, as it can create a disconnect between reported earnings and actual cash flow.
    • The company's ability to compete with its peers is a key risk factor, as the home improvement industry is highly competitive.
    • Macroeconomic factors, such as inflation, interest rates, and housing market trends, can significantly impact consumer demand for home improvement products and services.

  6. Valuation Analysis:

    • LOW's valuation metrics, such as its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio, are generally in line with its peers.
    • The company's valuation is supported by its strong financial performance, growth opportunities, and strategic initiatives.
    • However, the company's high debt levels and potential challenges in maintaining profitability could put downward pressure on its valuation.

  7. Price Performance:

    • LOW's stock price has generally outperformed the benchmark XLY over the past three years, indicating strong performance in the home improvement sector.
    • However, LOW's stock price has been more volatile than XLY, with higher annualized volatility and a lower Sharpe ratio. This suggests that LOW is a riskier investment than XLY.
    • Compared to its peers, LOW's price performance has been mixed. It has generally underperformed TSCO but has outperformed HD in the 3-year period.

  8. Future Outlook:

    • LOW's management has provided positive guidance for the future, with expectations for continued growth in revenue and profitability.
    • The company's strategic initiatives, such as its "Total Home" strategy and investments in technology, are expected to drive future growth.
    • However, the company's ability to manage its debt levels and compete with its peers will be key to its future success.

  9. Summary:

    • LOW is a financially sound company with a strong track record of growth and profitability. The company's "Total Home" strategy and investments in technology are expected to drive future growth.
    • However, the company faces several risks and threats, including intense competition, macroeconomic uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, and cybersecurity threats.
    • LOW's valuation is generally in line with its peers, but its high debt levels and potential challenges in maintaining profitability could put downward pressure on its valuation.
    • The company's stock price has generally outperformed the benchmark XLY over the past three years, but it has been more volatile than XLY.
    • Overall, LOW is a well-positioned company with growth potential, but investors should be aware of the risks and threats associated with the company.
Peer fundamentals 
Fundamentals
Insights
  • Lowe's is navigating a challenging macroeconomic environment, with softening DIY demand offset by continued strength in its Pro customer segment and online sales.
  • The company's strategic initiatives around its "Total Home" strategy, omnichannel capabilities, and Perpetual Productivity Improvement program appear to be helping it adapt to evolving industry trends and manage costs.
  • The company's profitability is strong, as evidenced by its high return on average assets, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital. However, these ratios are decreasing, suggesting that the company may be facing some challenges in maintaining its profitability.
  • The company's liquidity position is strong, as evidenced by its current ratio and quick ratio. However, these ratios are below the industry average, suggesting that the company may be facing some challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.
  • The company's financial leverage is high, as evidenced by its debt / EBITDA ratio. This ratio is significantly above the industry average, suggesting that the company may be taking on too much debt.
  • The company's free cash flow margin is increasing, indicating that the company is becoming more efficient at generating cash from its operations.
  • The company's future prospects are positive, as evidenced by its strong cash flow generation, improving profitability, and strategic initiatives.
  • The company's ability to manage its debt levels and compete with its peers will be key to its future success.
Analysis

  • Revenue - Revenue growth is increasing, but it is still below the industry average. - The company's "Total Home" strategy, which is focused on enhancing its omnichannel capabilities, improving its Pro customer offerings, and expanding localization efforts, is driving revenue growth. - The company is facing challenges in competing with its peers, as evidenced by its lower-than-industry-average revenue growth.

    • Profitability

      • The company's profitability is strong, as evidenced by its high return on average assets, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital. However, these ratios are decreasing, suggesting that the company may be facing some challenges in maintaining its profitability.
      • The company's profitability is also strong, as evidenced by its high net profit margin and EBITDA margin. However, these ratios are below the industry average, suggesting that the company may be facing some challenges in competing with its peers.

    • Liquidity

      • The company's liquidity position is strong, as evidenced by its current ratio and quick ratio. However, these ratios are below the industry average, suggesting that the company may be facing some challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

    • Solvency

      • The company's financial leverage is high, as evidenced by its debt / EBITDA ratio. This ratio is significantly above the industry average, suggesting that the company may be taking on too much debt.

    • Operational Efficiency

      • The company's asset utilization efficiency is improving, as evidenced by the increasing trend in return on average assets, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital. However, these ratios are still below the industry average, suggesting that the company may be facing some challenges in effectively utilizing its assets.

    • Cash Flow Analysis

      • The company's cash flow from operations is strong, as evidenced by the increasing trend in net operating cash flow.
      • The company's cash flow from investing activities is decreasing, as evidenced by the decreasing trend in capital expenditures.
      • The company's cash flow from financing activities is decreasing, as evidenced by the decreasing trend in net financing cash flow.
      • The company's free cash flow margin is increasing, indicating that the company is becoming more efficient at generating cash from its operations.

    • Risk Factors

      • The company's high debt levels are a significant risk factor.
      • The company's reliance on non-cash items to boost earnings is a risk factor.
      • The company's ability to compete with its peers is a risk factor.

    • Future Outlook

      • The company's future prospects are positive, as evidenced by its strong cash flow generation, improving profitability, and strategic initiatives.
      • The company's ability to manage its debt levels and compete with its peers will be key to its future success.
Most recent earnings report
Financial statements 
All public filings
Comparative Analysis
Benchmarks (as of 2024-08-09)
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY)
  • Performance Comparison:
    • LOW has consistently outperformed XLY over all periods, with the most significant outperformance occurring in the 3-year period, where LOW outperformed XLY by 31.94%. This suggests that LOW has been a strong performer in the home improvement sector.
  • Risk and Return Analysis:
    • LOW has provided higher annualized returns than XLY over all periods, indicating that LOW has been a more profitable investment.
    • LOW has also been more volatile than XLY, with higher annualized volatility. This suggests that LOW is a riskier investment than XLY.
    • LOW's maximum drawdown of 33.86% is slightly lower than XLY's maximum drawdown of 39.67%. This indicates that LOW has been more resilient to market downturns than XLY.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:
    • XLY has consistently offered a better risk-adjusted return than LOW, as indicated by its higher Sharpe ratio. This suggests that XLY has been a more efficient investment than LOW.
    • LOW's beta suggests that it is slightly less risky than XLY, as it is less sensitive to market movements. This indicates that LOW is a more stable investment than XLY.
  • Overall Assessment:
    • LOW has been a strong performer in the home improvement sector, consistently outperforming XLY over all periods. However, LOW has also been more volatile than XLY, with higher annualized volatility and a slightly lower Sharpe ratio. This suggests that LOW is a riskier investment than XLY, but it has also been more resilient to market downturns.
    • The recent trends in volatility, drawdowns, and Sharpe ratios suggest that both LOW and XLY are becoming more sensitive to market movements. However, LOW's beta remains slightly lower than XLY's, indicating that LOW is still slightly less risky than XLY.
    • Investors seeking higher returns may consider LOW, but they should be aware of the higher risk associated with the stock. Investors seeking a more stable and risk-averse investment may prefer XLY.
Peers Price History(as of 2024-08-30)
The Home Depot, Inc. (HD)Tractor Supply Co. (TSCO)
  • Performance Comparison:
    • LOW has generally underperformed TSCO over the past three years, particularly in the longer-term periods (1 year, 2 years, and 3 years). However, LOW has outperformed HD in the 3-year period and has shown more consistent performance in shorter-term periods (1 week, 1 month, and 3 months).
    • The consistency of LOW's performance relative to its peers has been mixed. While it has shown more consistent performance in shorter-term periods, its longer-term performance has been less consistent, particularly compared to TSCO.
  • Risk and Return Analysis:
    • LOW has provided lower annualized returns than TSCO over the past three years. However, LOW has provided slightly higher annualized returns than HD in the 3-year period.
    • LOW has exhibited lower annualized volatility than TSCO, but its volatility has been similar to HD. This suggests that LOW may be a less risky investment than TSCO, but its risk profile is similar to HD.
    • LOW has experienced a larger maximum drawdown than TSCO and HD, indicating a higher risk profile. This suggests that LOW may be more susceptible to market downturns than its peers.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:
    • LOW has generally shown a lower Sharpe ratio than TSCO, indicating that TSCO has offered better risk-adjusted returns. However, LOW's Sharpe ratio has been similar to HD, suggesting that their risk-adjusted returns have been comparable.
    • LOW's beta value has been consistently above 1, indicating that it is more volatile than the overall market. This suggests that LOW is a moderately risky investment, similar to its peers.
  • Overall Assessment:
    • LOW has generally underperformed TSCO in terms of both absolute returns and risk-adjusted returns. However, LOW has shown more consistent performance in shorter-term periods and has outperformed HD in the 3-year period.
    • LOW's risk profile is similar to HD, with both companies exhibiting moderate volatility and sensitivity to market movements. However, LOW has experienced a larger maximum drawdown than its peers, indicating a higher risk profile.
    • Investors seeking higher returns and a lower risk profile may prefer TSCO. However, investors seeking a more consistent performance in shorter-term periods and a company with a similar risk profile to HD may consider LOW.
    • It's important to note that the home improvement sector can be susceptible to market swings, as evidenced by the volatility and drawdowns experienced by all three companies. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and investment goals before making any investment decisions.
Peers Fundamentals(as of 2024-07-31)
The Home Depot, Inc. (HD)Tractor Supply Co. (TSCO)

  1. Market Position and Size:

    • LOW is a mid-sized player in the home improvement retail sector, with a market capitalization of 139991.0, significantly larger than TSCO but smaller than HD.
    • Its revenue, EBITDA, and net income align with its market capitalization, indicating a balanced growth and profitability strategy.

  2. Profitability and Efficiency:

    • LOW exhibits strong profitability, with EBITDA and net profit margins exceeding both peers and industry averages, highlighting its operational efficiency and expense management.
    • Its ROA, ROTC, and ROIC also outperform the industry average, indicating efficient asset utilization and capital allocation.

  3. Financial Health and Stability:

    • LOW's liquidity is slightly lower than the industry average, suggesting potential areas for improvement in managing working capital.
    • However, its debt levels are significantly higher than both peers and the industry average, indicating a higher level of financial leverage and potential risks associated with debt servicing.

  4. Valuation and Market Perception:

    • LOW's valuation metrics, including EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, and P/E, are lower than its peers and the industry average, suggesting that the market may be undervaluing LOW compared to its peers and industry standards.

  5. Cash Flow and Capital Management:

    • LOW generates strong cash flow from operations, exceeding TSCO's but lagging behind HD's, indicating a potential need to improve cash flow generation efficiency.
    • Its capital expenditure is higher than TSCO's but lower than HD's, suggesting a balanced approach to investing in its business.

  6. Growth and Future Prospects:

    • LOW's growth is mixed, with strong growth in profitability and cash flow generation but lagging growth in revenue and operating profit.
    • Its 5-year CAGR is significantly higher than its 3-year CAGR for profitability and cash flow metrics, indicating accelerating growth in these areas. However, its 5-year CAGR is lower than its 3-year CAGR for revenue and operating profit metrics, indicating decelerating growth in these areas.

  7. Potential for Investment:

    • LOW's strong profitability, efficiency, and cash flow generation make it an attractive investment for those seeking exposure to the home improvement retail sector.
    • However, investors should be aware of the challenges in revenue growth and high debt levels, which could impact its future performance.

  8. Key Risks and Considerations:

    • LOW's high debt levels pose a significant risk, as it could impact its ability to service debt and potentially limit its financial flexibility.
    • Its lagging revenue growth could hinder its ability to maintain profitability and compete effectively in the long term.

  9. Overall Assessment:

    • LOW is a financially healthy company with strong profitability, efficiency, and cash flow generation. However, it faces challenges in revenue growth and high debt levels, which could impact its future performance.
    • Its valuation metrics suggest that the market may be undervaluing LOW compared to its peers, potentially due to its lower growth in revenue and operating profit.
    • Investors should carefully consider these factors before making an investment decision.