Thematic evaluation
Back to company overview

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. (MMC)

August 21, 2024

Compared to: Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) | Willis Towers Watson Plc (WTW) | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)

Our reasoning

Marsh & McLennan's current valuation appears fair, balancing its strong financial performance and market position against potential risks and growth challenges. The company's valuation multiples are slightly above historical averages but in line with peers, reflecting its consistent performance and market leadership. However, the potential for economic headwinds and increasing debt levels temper the upside potential.

Key takeaways
  • Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. (MMC) exhibits strong financial performance, with steady revenue growth, strong profitability, and a conservative leverage position.
  • The company's profitability ratios, including ROA, ROE, ROTC, and ROIC, are significantly higher than industry averages, indicating strong performance relative to its assets, equity, total capital, and invested capital.
  • MMC generates strong cash flow from its core business operations and has a healthy liquidity position.
  • The company faces several key risks, including exposure to macroeconomic conditions, legal/regulatory compliance, talent management, and competitive pressures.
  • MMC's valuation is generally in line with its peers, suggesting a fair valuation relative to its industry.
  • The company's historical price performance has been strong, with outperformance against XLF and mixed performance compared to its peers.
  • MMC's future outlook is positive, with expectations for continued growth and profitability.
Fairly valued
Ask a question about Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. (MMC)
Evaluation summary

  1. Company Overview:

    • Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. (MMC) is a global professional services firm providing risk, strategy, and people advisory services through four main businesses: Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman Group.
    • MMC's revenue is primarily generated from risk management, insurance broking, and consulting services, with a significant portion coming from the Risk and Insurance Services segment (62%) and the Consulting segment (38%).
    • MMC targets a diverse range of clients, including commercial and consumer businesses, governments, and individuals, across various industries and geographies.
    • For comparative analysis, we will be using the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) as a benchmark and Willis Towers Watson Plc (WTW) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) as industry peers.

  2. Financial Performance:

    • MMC has demonstrated consistent revenue growth, driven by its diversified portfolio and market-leading positions across its businesses.
    • The company's profitability has been strong, with steady growth in operating income and net income.
    • MMC's profitability ratios, including ROA, ROE, and ROIC, are significantly higher than industry averages, indicating strong performance relative to its assets, equity, total capital, and invested capital.
    • MMC's profitability has been consistently higher than WTW's but comparable to AJG's, suggesting a strong financial position relative to its peers.

  3. Operational Efficiency:

    • MMC's balance sheet analysis reveals a strong cash position and increasing accounts receivable, suggesting a healthy liquidity position and the ability to meet short-term obligations.
    • The company's working capital management appears efficient, with minimal inefficiencies identified.
    • MMC generates strong cash flow from its core business operations, as evidenced by the steady growth in funds from operations.
    • The company's asset quality is generally good, with a conservative leverage position and a lower risk of financial distress.
    • MMC's free cash flow trend analysis shows a steady growth, indicating a strong ability to generate cash flow and fund future investments.
    • The company's capital expenditure analysis reveals a shift towards a more conservative investment strategy, which could impact future growth prospects.
    • MMC's dividend and share repurchase program appears sustainable, with a consistent track record of returning capital to shareholders.
    • MMC's operational efficiency is comparable to AJG's but lower than WTW's, suggesting a potential for improvement in certain areas.
    • MMC's short-term and long-term liquidity ratios are strong, indicating a healthy financial position and the ability to meet its financial obligations.
    • The company's debt-to-equity and leverage ratios are significantly lower than industry averages, suggesting a conservative leverage position and a lower risk of financial distress.

  4. Growth Opportunities:

    • MMC has identified several growth opportunities, including market expansion through acquisitions, R&D investments, and geographic expansion.
    • The company has a history of successful M&A activity, with several acquisitions completed in recent years to expand its capabilities and market reach.
    • MMC's R&D pipeline is robust, with new solutions launched across its businesses, such as Blue[i] Risk Appetite Analytics, CatStop+, and Quotient.
    • The company has a global presence, with operations in over 130 countries, and is actively pursuing growth opportunities in emerging markets.
    • MMC's strategic focus areas include innovation, talent development, and client relationship management.
    • The company has made significant progress on previously announced initiatives, including the development of new digital solutions and the expansion of its consulting services.
    • MMC's capital allocation strategies are aligned with its long-term growth objectives, with a focus on investments, acquisitions, and share repurchases.
    • Management has a strong track record of executing strategic plans, with consistent financial performance and market share growth.

  5. Risks and Threats:

    • MMC faces several key risks, including exposure to macroeconomic conditions, legal/regulatory compliance, talent management, and competitive pressures.
    • The company's operations are sensitive to macroeconomic factors, such as economic downturns, inflation, and geopolitical instability.
    • MMC operates in a highly regulated industry, with complex and evolving laws and regulations that could impact its operations and costs.
    • The company faces intense competition from other global and regional insurance brokers, consulting firms, and companies providing risk-related services.
    • MMC's business model is also subject to disintermediation and technological change, which could disrupt its traditional services and revenue streams.

  6. Valuation Analysis:

    • MMC's valuation metrics, such as P/E and EV/EBITDA, are generally in line with its peers, suggesting a fair valuation relative to its industry.
    • The company's valuation is supported by its strong financial performance, diversified business model, and growth opportunities.
    • Potential catalysts for MMC's valuation include continued revenue growth, margin expansion, and strategic acquisitions.

  7. Price Performance:

    • MMC's historical price trend analysis shows that the company has generally outperformed XLF over the past three years, with the exception of the one-year period.
    • MMC's performance has been more consistent than XLF's, with fewer periods of significant underperformance.
    • MMC's price performance has been mixed compared to its peers, with outperformance in some periods and underperformance in others.
    • MMC's volatility and beta analysis suggest that the company is less sensitive to market movements than XLF and its peers, indicating a lower risk profile.

  8. Future Outlook:

    • MMC's management guidance for the full year 2024 is positive, with expectations for mid-single-digit or better underlying revenue growth, margin expansion, and strong adjusted EPS growth.
    • Analyst estimates for MMC's future performance are generally positive, with consensus expectations for continued growth and profitability.
    • The company's strong financial performance, diversified business model, and commitment to innovation suggest a positive future outlook.
    • However, the company's increasing debt levels and potential slowdown in M&A activity could pose challenges to its future growth.

  9. Summary:

    • MMC is a leading global professional services firm with a diversified business model, strong financial performance, and a conservative leverage position.
    • The company's profitability ratios are significantly higher than industry averages, indicating strong performance relative to its assets, equity, total capital, and invested capital.
    • MMC generates strong cash flow from its core business operations and has a healthy liquidity position.
    • The company faces several key risks, including exposure to macroeconomic conditions, legal/regulatory compliance, talent management, and competitive pressures.
    • MMC's valuation is generally in line with its peers, suggesting a fair valuation relative to its industry.
    • The company's historical price performance has been strong, with outperformance against XLF and mixed performance compared to its peers.
    • MMC's future outlook is positive, with expectations for continued growth and profitability.
    • However, the company's increasing debt levels and potential slowdown in M&A activity could pose challenges to its future growth.
    • Overall, MMC appears to be a strong performer with a favorable risk profile.
    • Investors should consider the company's strong financial performance, growth opportunities, and conservative leverage position, while also being aware of the potential risks and challenges.
Peer fundamentals 
Fundamentals
Insights
  • Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. (MMC) exhibits strong financial performance, with steady revenue growth, strong profitability, and a conservative leverage position.
  • The company's profitability ratios, including ROA, ROE, ROTC, and ROIC, are significantly higher than industry averages, indicating strong performance relative to its assets, equity, total capital, and invested capital.
  • The company's strong cash position and increasing accounts receivable suggest a healthy liquidity position and the ability to meet short-term obligations.
  • The company's increasing debt levels, while still conservative, could limit its financial flexibility and increase financial risk.
  • The company's decline in net assets from acquisitions suggests a potential slowdown in M&A activity, which could impact future growth prospects.
  • The company's decline in total capital expenditure suggests a shift towards a more conservative investment strategy, which could also impact future growth prospects.
  • The company's ability to navigate macroeconomic uncertainties and maintain its strong profitability will be crucial for its future success.
Analysis
  • Revenue - The company has experienced steady revenue growth, indicating strong demand for its services. - This growth is driven by its diversified portfolio and market-leading positions across its businesses, particularly Marsh, Guy Carpenter, and Mercer. - The company's focus on innovation and new solutions, such as Blue[i] Risk Appetite Analytics, CatStop+, and Quotient, is also contributing to revenue growth.
    • Profitability
      • The company exhibits strong profitability, as evidenced by its steady growth in operating income and net income.
      • Its profitability ratios, including ROA, ROE, ROTC, and ROIC, are significantly higher than industry averages, indicating strong performance relative to its assets, equity, total capital, and invested capital.
      • The company's ability to control operating expenses in relation to revenue growth suggests a focus on efficiency and cost management, contributing to its strong profitability.
    • Liquidity
      • The company's strong cash position and increasing accounts receivable suggest a healthy liquidity position and the ability to meet short-term obligations.
    • Solvency
      • The company maintains a conservative leverage position, with its total debt to total equity ratio and debt to EBITDA ratio significantly lower than industry averages.
      • This suggests a strong long-term solvency position and a lower risk of financial distress.
    • Operational Efficiency
      • The company's declining net property, plant, and equipment suggests a potential shift towards a more asset-light business model, which could improve asset utilization efficiency.
      • This shift could further enhance the company's profitability and financial flexibility.
    • Cash Flow Analysis
      • The company generates strong cash flow from its core business operations, as evidenced by the steady growth in funds from operations.
      • However, the company's cash flow to net income ratio has been declining over time, suggesting a potential disconnect between earnings and cash flow.
      • This could be due to factors such as increasing investments in innovation and acquisitions, which may not immediately translate into cash flow.
    • Risk Factors
      • The company's increasing debt levels, while still conservative, could limit its financial flexibility and increase financial risk.
      • The company's decline in net assets from acquisitions suggests a potential slowdown in M&A activity, which could impact future growth prospects.
      • The company's decline in total capital expenditure suggests a shift towards a more conservative investment strategy, which could also impact future growth prospects.
      • The company faces several key risks, including exposure to macroeconomic conditions, legal/regulatory compliance, talent management, and competitive pressures, which could impact its future growth and profitability.
    • Future Outlook
      • The company's strong financial performance, diversified business model, and commitment to innovation suggest a positive future outlook.
      • However, the company's increasing debt levels and potential slowdown in M&A activity could pose challenges to its future growth.
      • The company's ability to navigate macroeconomic uncertainties and maintain its strong profitability will be crucial for its future success.
Most recent earnings report
Financial statements 
All public filings
Comparative Analysis
Benchmarks (as of 2024-08-20)
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)
  • Performance Comparison:
    • MMC has generally outperformed XLF over the past three years, with the exception of the one-year period. MMC's outperformance is particularly notable in the three-year period, where it outperformed XLF by 27.94%.
    • MMC's performance has been more consistent than XLF's, with fewer periods of significant underperformance.
  • Risk and Return Analysis:
    • MMC has provided higher annualized returns than XLF over the past three years. For example, MMC's three-year annualized return was 14.49%, while XLF's was 6.89%.
    • MMC has been less volatile than XLF, with a lower annualized volatility. For example, MMC's three-year annualized volatility was 14.92%, while XLF's was 18.17%.
    • MMC's maximum drawdown was 19.23%, while XLF's was 25.64%. This suggests that MMC has a lower risk profile than XLF, as it has experienced smaller drawdowns.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:
    • MMC's Sharpe Ratio has been generally higher than XLF's, indicating that it has offered a better risk-adjusted return. For example, in Q1 2022, MMC's Sharpe Ratio was 2.09, while XLF's was 0.86.
    • MMC's beta has been generally lower than 1, suggesting that it is less sensitive to market movements than XLF. For example, in Q1 2022, MMC's beta was 0.84, while XLF's was 0.98.
  • Overall Assessment:
    • MMC has demonstrated strong relative performance, with higher annualized returns and lower volatility than XLF. Its lower maximum drawdown and higher Sharpe Ratio further suggest that it offers a better risk-adjusted return.
    • MMC's lower beta indicates that it is less sensitive to market movements than XLF, making it a potentially less risky investment.
    • Overall, MMC appears to be a strong performer with a favorable risk profile. However, it is important to note that past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Investors should conduct further research and consider their own investment goals and risk tolerance before making any investment decisions.
Peers Price History(as of 2024-08-20)
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG)Willis Towers Watson Plc (WTW)
  • Performance Comparison:
    • MMC has shown mixed performance compared to its peers. While it has outperformed WTW in the 6-month and 3-year periods, it has underperformed both WTW and AJG in most other periods, including the 1-year and 2-year periods. This suggests that MMC's performance has been inconsistent relative to its peers.
  • Risk and Return Analysis:
    • MMC has provided lower annualized returns than WTW in all periods, but it has outperformed AJG in the 3-year period. This suggests that MMC's returns have been lower than WTW's but comparable to AJG's.
    • MMC has exhibited lower annualized volatility than both WTW and AJG in most periods. This indicates that MMC has been less volatile than its peers, suggesting a lower risk profile.
    • MMC's maximum drawdown of 19.23% on 06/16/2022 was smaller than WTW's 28.42% but larger than AJG's 18.8%. This suggests that MMC's risk profile is lower than WTW's but higher than AJG's.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:
    • MMC's Sharpe ratio has generally been higher than WTW's, indicating better risk-adjusted returns. AJG's Sharpe ratio has generally been higher than WTW's but lower than MMC's. This suggests that MMC has offered a better risk-adjusted return than WTW but a comparable risk-adjusted return to AJG.
    • MMC's beta values have consistently been below 1, indicating that it is less sensitive to market movements than the overall market. This suggests that MMC has a lower risk profile than the market.
  • Overall Assessment:
    • MMC has a lower risk profile than WTW but a higher risk profile than AJG. It has provided lower annualized returns than WTW but comparable returns to AJG. However, MMC has offered a better risk-adjusted return than WTW and a comparable risk-adjusted return to AJG. The recent trends suggest that all three companies are becoming less volatile and less sensitive to market movements. Investors seeking lower volatility and better risk-adjusted returns may consider MMC, while investors seeking higher returns may consider WTW.
Peers Fundamentals(as of 2024-06-30)
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG)Willis Towers Watson Plc (WTW)
  1. Market Position and Size:
    • MMC is the largest company in the peer group, with a market capitalization significantly exceeding its competitors.
    • This size advantage translates into greater revenue, EBITDA, and net income, highlighting MMC's dominant position in the industry.
  2. Profitability and Efficiency:
    • MMC exhibits significantly higher profitability compared to its peers and industry averages.
    • Its high Gross Profit Margin, EBITDA Margin, and Net Profit Margin highlight its strong competitive position and ability to generate substantial profits.
    • MMC demonstrates superior efficiency in generating returns compared to its peers and industry averages.
    • Its high returns on assets, equity, and capital highlight its ability to effectively manage its resources and generate significant value for its stakeholders.
  3. Financial Health and Stability:
    • MMC's liquidity and solvency metrics are generally in line with or better than its peers and industry averages.
    • Its manageable debt burden and a strong cash flow position suggest a healthy financial foundation.
    • MMC's balance sheet structure is generally sound, with a strong equity base and a manageable level of debt.
  4. Valuation and Market Perception:
    • MMC's valuation metrics reflect a premium valuation relative to its peers and industry averages, suggesting a strong market perception of its growth potential and profitability.
  5. Cash Flow and Capital Management:
    • MMC generates strong cash flow compared to its peers, considering its market cap.
    • Its high Net Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow demonstrate its ability to generate substantial cash flow, providing flexibility for future investments and shareholder returns.
  6. Growth and Future Prospect:
    • MMC consistently demonstrates higher growth compared to the peer group average in several key metrics.
    • Its strong growth rates across multiple metrics suggest a robust competitive position and a positive outlook for future growth.
    • MMC's growth rates have been relatively stable over the past five years, with minimal year-to-year fluctuations.
    • MMC's 5-year CAGRs are generally higher than its 3-year CAGRs for most metrics, indicating a sustained growth trend.
  7. Potential for Investment:
    • MMC presents an attractive investment opportunity, considering its size, growth potential, profitability, efficiency, financial stability, and valuation compared to both peers and industry benchmarks.
    • Its strong financial performance, robust growth trajectory, and dominant market position suggest a positive outlook for future value creation.
  8. Key Risks and Considerations:
    • MMC's higher leverage compared to the industry average warrants monitoring.
    • MMC's Free Cash Flow growth has been inconsistent over the past five years, with some periods of significant underperformance compared to peers.
    • MMC's EBIT Margin has shown some fluctuations over the past five years, indicating potential challenges in maintaining consistent profitability.
  9. Overall Assessment:
    • MMC exhibits strong overall financial health and performance relative to its peer group and industry averages.
    • Its high profitability, efficiency, and growth rates, coupled with a manageable debt burden and strong cash flow generation, indicate a solid financial foundation and a positive outlook for future performance.
    • MMC holds a dominant position within its peer group and the broader industry, based on its market cap and financial performance.
    • Its superior profitability, efficiency, and growth rates, coupled with its large size, indicate a strong competitive advantage and a leading position in the market.