Thematic evaluation
Back to company overview

Morgan Stanley (MS)

September 29, 2024

Compared to: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) | The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)

Our reasoning

Morgan Stanley appears moderately undervalued based on its strong revenue growth, improving profitability, and growth prospects in wealth management and investment banking. While the company faces risks from high debt levels and potential operational inefficiencies, these concerns seem more than accounted for in the current below-average valuation multiples. The potential for operational improvements and successful execution of growth strategies could drive significant value creation.

Key takeaways
  • Morgan Stanley is a global financial services firm with a diversified business model and a strong market position.
  • The firm has demonstrated strong revenue growth and improving profitability in recent quarters.
  • However, the firm's high debt levels, decreasing net operating cash flow, and potential operational inefficiencies raise concerns about long-term solvency and financial flexibility.
  • The firm's growth opportunities are driven by continued investments in its business segments, particularly in wealth management and investment banking.
  • The firm faces a range of risks, including market volatility, credit losses, operational failures, and an evolving legal/regulatory landscape.
  • Morgan Stanley's valuation is currently below the industry average, suggesting potential undervaluation. However, the firm's high debt levels and potential operational inefficiencies may be contributing to this undervaluation.
  • The firm's stock price has underperformed the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) over most of the analyzed periods, particularly in the longer-term periods. However, MS has outperformed XLF in shorter-term periods, suggesting that MS's performance is more volatile than XLF's.
  • Morgan Stanley's future outlook is cautiously optimistic, with the potential for continued revenue growth and profitability.
Undervalued
Ask a question about Morgan Stanley (MS)
Evaluation summary

  1. Company Overview:

    • Morgan Stanley is a global financial services firm with a diversified business model, operating in three primary segments: Institutional Securities, Wealth Management, and Investment Management.
    • The Institutional Securities segment provides investment banking, equity and fixed income sales/trading, lending, and research services to a wide range of clients, including corporations, governments, financial institutions, and ultra-high net worth individuals.
    • The Wealth Management segment offers a comprehensive suite of financial services and solutions to individual investors and small-to-medium sized businesses, encompassing brokerage, advisory, lending, and banking services.
    • The Investment Management segment provides a broad range of investment strategies and products across geographies, asset classes, and public/private markets to institutional and individual clients.
    • Morgan Stanley's target market is diverse, encompassing a wide range of clients from individuals to large institutions, reflecting its broad product and service offerings.
    • For comparative analysis, we will be using the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) as a benchmark and The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) as industry peers.

  2. Financial Performance:

    • Morgan Stanley has demonstrated strong revenue growth in recent quarters, driven by robust performance in both interest income and non-interest income.
    • The firm's net profit margin has been increasing, indicating improving profitability.
    • The firm's return on average total equity is slightly above the industry average, suggesting strong profitability relative to equity.
    • However, the firm's return on average assets, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital are all significantly below the industry average, suggesting potential inefficiencies in asset utilization.
    • Compared to its peers, Morgan Stanley has outperformed The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) in terms of revenue growth and profitability but has underperformed The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) in these areas.

  3. Operational Efficiency:

    • Morgan Stanley's balance sheet analysis reveals increasing debt levels and decreasing equity levels, raising concerns about long-term solvency.
    • The firm's working capital management appears to be a potential area for improvement, as evidenced by the decreasing net operating cash flow and the current ratio being below the industry average.
    • The firm's cash flow analysis shows increasing funds from operations, indicating strong cash flow generation from core business operations. However, the net operating cash flow is decreasing, potentially due to factors such as increased investment in working capital or higher operating expenses.
    • The firm's free cash flow margin is increasing, suggesting the firm is generating more free cash flow relative to its revenue.
    • The firm's capital expenditure analysis reveals a consistent trend of investment in its business segments, particularly in wealth management and investment banking.
    • The firm's dividend and share repurchase sustainability analysis indicates a commitment to returning value to shareholders, with a recent increase in the quarterly dividend.
    • Compared to its peers, Morgan Stanley has a moderate risk profile, with lower volatility and drawdowns than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) but higher than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
    • The firm's short-term liquidity position appears strong, as evidenced by the increasing cash and due from banks. However, the firm's long-term solvency is a concern due to the increasing debt levels and decreasing equity levels.
    • The firm's debt-to-equity and leverage ratios are significantly higher than the industry average, indicating a high level of financial leverage and potential concerns about long-term solvency.

  4. Growth Opportunities:

    • Morgan Stanley is pursuing growth opportunities through continued investments in its business segments, particularly in wealth management and investment banking.
    • The firm is leveraging its integrated investment banking platform to provide differentiated advice and solutions to clients.
    • In wealth management, the firm is focused on aggregating assets, delivering strong advice, and investing in areas like customization and real assets within investment management.
    • The firm's strategic focus areas include navigating uncertainty around the forward rate path, geopolitics, and the US political cycle.
    • The firm expects continued growth in investment banking, driven by factors like moderating inflation and stabilizing front-end rates.
    • The firm anticipates net interest income to inflect higher in the coming year, as the impact of deposit repricing is offset by gains from the investment portfolio repricing.
    • The firm's focus on driving operating leverage and reducing expenses is expected to continue, contributing to sustained profitability.

  5. Risks and Threats:

    • Morgan Stanley faces a range of risks, including market volatility, credit losses, operational failures, and an evolving legal/regulatory landscape.
    • The firm's decreasing equity levels and increasing debt levels raise concerns about the firm's long-term financial stability.
    • The firm's high level of financial leverage could increase financial risk.
    • The firm's decreasing net operating cash flow and increasing debt levels raise concerns about the firm's financial flexibility for future investments or economic downturns.
    • The firm's return on average assets, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital are all significantly below the industry average, suggesting potential inefficiencies in asset utilization.
    • The firm's competitive landscape is highly competitive, with Morgan Stanley facing competition from commercial banks, investment banks, asset managers, and emerging fintech firms.
    • The industry is subject to extensive regulation, with Morgan Stanley operating as a financial holding company under the oversight of the Federal Reserve and other regulatory bodies.

  6. Valuation Analysis:

    • Morgan Stanley's valuation metrics, such as P/E and EV/EBITDA, are currently below the industry average, suggesting potential undervaluation.
    • However, the firm's high debt levels and potential operational inefficiencies may be contributing to this undervaluation.
    • Compared to its peers, Morgan Stanley's valuation is more in line with The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS), which is considered a more highly valued firm.

  7. Price Performance:

    • Morgan Stanley's stock price has underperformed the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) over most of the analyzed periods, particularly in the longer-term periods. However, MS has outperformed XLF in shorter-term periods, suggesting that MS's performance is more volatile than XLF's.
    • Compared to its peers, Morgan Stanley has generally outperformed The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) over the past three years, particularly in the longer timeframes. However, it has consistently underperformed The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS), especially in the shorter timeframes.

  8. Future Outlook:

    • Morgan Stanley's management guidance suggests a cautiously optimistic view on the investment banking environment, with the potential for a sustained rebound in activity.
    • The firm expects continued growth in investment banking, driven by factors like moderating inflation and stabilizing front-end rates.
    • The firm anticipates net interest income to inflect higher in the coming year, as the impact of deposit repricing is offset by gains from the investment portfolio repricing.
    • The firm's focus on driving operating leverage and reducing expenses is expected to continue, contributing to sustained profitability.
    • Analyst estimates for Morgan Stanley's future performance are generally positive, with consensus expectations for continued revenue growth and profitability.

  9. Summary:

    • Morgan Stanley is a global financial services firm with a diversified business model and a strong market position.
    • The firm has demonstrated strong revenue growth and improving profitability in recent quarters.
    • However, the firm's high debt levels, decreasing net operating cash flow, and potential operational inefficiencies raise concerns about long-term solvency and financial flexibility.
    • The firm's growth opportunities are driven by continued investments in its business segments, particularly in wealth management and investment banking.
    • The firm faces a range of risks, including market volatility, credit losses, operational failures, and an evolving legal/regulatory landscape.
    • Morgan Stanley's valuation is currently below the industry average, suggesting potential undervaluation. However, the firm's high debt levels and potential operational inefficiencies may be contributing to this undervaluation.
    • The firm's stock price has underperformed the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) over most of the analyzed periods, particularly in the longer-term periods. However, MS has outperformed XLF in shorter-term periods, suggesting that MS's performance is more volatile than XLF's.
    • Morgan Stanley's future outlook is cautiously optimistic, with the potential for continued revenue growth and profitability.
    • Overall, Morgan Stanley is a complex company with both strengths and weaknesses. The firm's strong revenue growth and improving profitability are positive signs. However, the firm's high debt levels, decreasing net operating cash flow, and potential operational inefficiencies raise concerns about long-term solvency and financial flexibility. Investors should carefully consider these factors before making any investment decisions.
Peer fundamentals 
Fundamentals
Insights
  • Morgan Stanley is experiencing strong revenue growth, driven by both interest income and non-interest income.
  • The firm's profitability is improving, as evidenced by the increasing net profit margin.
  • The firm's liquidity position appears strong, as evidenced by the increasing cash and due from banks.
  • The firm's increasing debt levels raise concerns about long-term solvency, particularly given the decreasing equity levels.
  • The firm's high level of financial leverage could increase financial risk.
  • The firm's decreasing net operating cash flow and increasing debt levels raise concerns about the firm's financial flexibility for future investments or economic downturns.
  • The firm's return on average assets, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital are all significantly below the industry average, suggesting potential inefficiencies in asset utilization.
  • The firm's continued investments in its business segments, particularly in wealth management and investment banking, are expected to drive further growth in assets and CapEx.
  • The firm's focus on maintaining robust capital levels and delivering durable earnings and returns through the cycle suggests a cautious approach to debt financing.
  • The firm expects continued growth in investment banking, driven by factors like moderating inflation and stabilizing front-end rates.
  • The firm anticipates net interest income to inflect higher in the coming year, as the impact of deposit repricing is offset by gains from the investment portfolio repricing.
  • The firm's focus on driving operating leverage and reducing expenses is expected to continue, contributing to sustained profitability.
Analysis
  • Revenue - Morgan Stanley's revenue growth is driven by strong performance in both interest income and non-interest income. - The increase in interest income is likely due to the firm's focus on growing its wealth management business, which generates significant interest income. - The increase in non-interest income is likely driven by strong performance in investment banking, equity, and fixed income trading, as highlighted in the earnings call.
    • Profitability
      • The firm's profitability is improving, as evidenced by the increasing net profit margin.
      • The firm's return on average total equity is slightly above the industry average, indicating strong profitability relative to equity.
      • The firm's return on average assets, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital are all significantly below the industry average, suggesting potential inefficiencies in asset utilization.
    • Liquidity
      • The firm appears to have a strong liquidity position, as evidenced by the increasing cash and due from banks.
      • The firm's current ratio is below the industry average, suggesting a potentially weaker short-term liquidity position.
    • Solvency
      • The firm's increasing debt levels raise concerns about long-term solvency, particularly given the decreasing equity levels.
      • The firm's total debt to total equity ratio is significantly higher than the industry average, indicating a high level of financial leverage and potential concerns about long-term solvency.
    • Operational Efficiency
      • The firm's return on average assets, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital are all significantly below the industry average, suggesting potential inefficiencies in asset utilization.
    • Cash Flow Analysis
      • The firm's funds from operations are increasing, indicating strong cash flow generation from core business operations.
      • The firm's net operating cash flow is decreasing, potentially due to factors such as increased investment in working capital or higher operating expenses.
      • The firm's free cash flow margin is increasing, suggesting the firm is generating more free cash flow relative to its revenue.
    • Risk Factors
      • The firm's decreasing equity levels and increasing debt levels raise concerns about the firm's long-term financial stability.
      • The firm's high level of financial leverage could increase financial risk.
      • The firm's decreasing net operating cash flow and increasing debt levels raise concerns about the firm's financial flexibility for future investments or economic downturns.
    • Future Outlook
      • The firm's continued investments in its business segments, particularly in wealth management and investment banking, are expected to drive further growth in assets and CapEx.
      • The firm's focus on maintaining robust capital levels and delivering durable earnings and returns through the cycle suggests a cautious approach to debt financing.
      • The firm expects continued growth in investment banking, driven by factors like moderating inflation and stabilizing front-end rates.
      • The firm anticipates net interest income to inflect higher in the coming year, as the impact of deposit repricing is offset by gains from the investment portfolio repricing.
      • The firm's focus on driving operating leverage and reducing expenses is expected to continue, contributing to sustained profitability.
Most recent earnings report
Financial statements 
All public filings
Comparative Analysis
Benchmarks (as of 2024-09-27)
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)
  • Performance Comparison:
    • Morgan Stanley (MS) has underperformed the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) over most of the analyzed periods, particularly in the longer-term periods (2 years and 3 years). However, MS has outperformed XLF in shorter-term periods, such as the 1-week and 1-month periods. This suggests that MS's performance is more volatile than XLF's.
    • The consistency of MS's performance relative to XLF is low. MS has shown periods of both outperformance and underperformance, indicating that its performance is not consistently better or worse than XLF.
  • Risk and Return Analysis:
    • Morgan Stanley (MS) has provided lower annualized returns than the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) over the analyzed periods. This suggests that XLF has been a better investment in terms of returns.
    • Morgan Stanley (MS) has exhibited higher annualized volatility than the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) throughout the analyzed period. This indicates that MS is a riskier investment than XLF.
    • The drawdown figures from previous peaks show that MS has experienced larger maximum drawdowns than XLF. This further supports the conclusion that MS has a higher risk profile than XLF.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:
    • The Sharpe Ratio of the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has consistently been higher than Morgan Stanley (MS) throughout the analyzed period. This indicates that XLF has offered a better risk-adjusted return than MS.
    • The Beta value of Morgan Stanley (MS) has consistently been greater than 1, indicating that MS is more sensitive to market movements than the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). This suggests that MS is a riskier investment than XLF.
  • Overall Assessment:
    • Based on the analysis, Morgan Stanley (MS) has underperformed the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) in terms of both absolute returns and risk-adjusted returns. MS has also exhibited higher volatility and larger drawdowns than XLF, indicating a higher risk profile.
    • The analysis suggests that XLF has been a better investment than MS over the analyzed period. However, it is important to note that past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Investors should consider their own risk tolerance and investment goals before making any investment decisions.
Peers Price History(as of 2024-09-27)
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS)The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW)
  • Performance Comparison:
    • Morgan Stanley (MS) has generally outperformed The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) over the past three years, particularly in the longer timeframes. However, it has consistently underperformed The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS), especially in the shorter timeframes.
    • The performance of Morgan Stanley (MS) has been less consistent compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS), which has shown more consistent outperformance.
  • Risk and Return Analysis:
    • Morgan Stanley (MS) has provided higher annualized returns than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) over the past three years. However, it has provided lower annualized returns than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
    • Morgan Stanley (MS) has exhibited lower annualized volatility than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) but higher volatility than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
    • The maximum drawdown experienced by Morgan Stanley (MS) is lower than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) but higher than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). This suggests that Morgan Stanley (MS) has a moderate risk profile compared to its peers.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:
    • The Sharpe Ratio of Morgan Stanley (MS) has been lower than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) but higher than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW), indicating that Morgan Stanley (MS) has offered a moderate risk-adjusted return compared to its peers.
    • The beta value of Morgan Stanley (MS) is slightly higher than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) but lower than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW), suggesting that Morgan Stanley (MS) is moderately sensitive to market movements compared to its peers.
  • Overall Assessment:
    • Morgan Stanley (MS) has shown a moderate performance track record, outperforming The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) but underperforming The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
    • The company has a moderate risk profile, with lower volatility and drawdowns than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) but higher than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
    • The risk-adjusted performance of Morgan Stanley (MS) is moderate, as indicated by its Sharpe Ratio, which is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) but higher than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW).
    • Investors should consider the company's moderate performance, risk profile, and risk-adjusted performance when making investment decisions.
Peers Fundamentals(as of 2024-06-30)
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS)The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW)
  1. Market Position and Size:
    • Morgan Stanley (MS) is the largest company in the peer group with a market capitalization of 162029.0, significantly larger than The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) at 113642.0 and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 154944.0. This suggests that MS holds a dominant position in the market.
    • MS's size advantage is reflected in its revenue, which is significantly higher than SCHW but slightly lower than GS. However, MS's EBITDA and net income are also significantly higher than both peers, suggesting a more profitable business model.
  2. Profitability and Efficiency:
    • MS's profitability metrics are mixed compared to peers and industry averages. While its Net Profit Margin is slightly higher than GS, it is significantly lower than SCHW and the industry average. This suggests that MS may be less efficient in converting revenue into profit compared to its peers.
    • MS's efficiency in generating returns is mixed compared to peers and industry averages. While its Return on Average Total Equity is slightly higher than GS and the industry average, it is significantly lower than SCHW. This suggests that MS may be less efficient in utilizing its equity capital to generate returns compared to its peers.
  3. Financial Health and Stability:
    • MS's liquidity and debt position are mixed compared to peers and industry averages. While its Current Ratio is higher than GS, it is lower than the industry average. Its Total Debt to Total Equity Ratio is significantly higher than both peers and the industry average, suggesting a higher level of leverage.
  4. Valuation and Market Perception:
    • MS's valuation metrics are mixed compared to peers and industry averages. While its Price To Earnings ratio is slightly lower than GS, it is significantly lower than SCHW and the industry average. This suggests that MS may be undervalued by the market compared to its peers.
  5. Cash Flow and Capital Management:
    • MS's cash flow generation is significantly lower than its peers, considering their market caps. Its Net Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow are both negative, while SCHW and GS have positive cash flows. This suggests that MS may be less efficient in generating cash flow from its operations compared to its peers.
  6. Growth and Future Prospects:
    • MS's growth trends are mixed compared to the peer group average. It shows consistently higher growth in sales revenue, but lower growth in net income, basic earnings per share, and return on average total equity. This suggests that MS may be experiencing growth in its top line, but not translating that growth into profitability.
    • MS's growth trends show significant year-to-year fluctuations. Its standard deviation for year-over-year growth rates is higher than the peer group average for most metrics, indicating a more volatile growth pattern. This suggests that MS's growth may be less predictable and more susceptible to external factors.
    • MS's 3-year CAGR figures are higher than its 5-year CAGR figures for sales revenue, suggesting a recent acceleration in growth. However, its 3-year CAGR figures are lower than its 5-year CAGR figures for net income, basic earnings per share, and return on average total equity, suggesting a deceleration in profitability growth. This suggests that MS's growth may be unsustainable in the long term.
  7. Potential for Investment:
    • MS presents a mixed investment proposition. Its size, growth potential, and strong earnings performance are attractive. However, its lower profitability, efficiency, and cash flow generation compared to peers, along with its high level of leverage, raise concerns about its sustainability and potential for future growth. Investors should carefully consider these factors before making an investment decision.
  8. Key Risks and Considerations:
    • MS's lower profitability and efficiency compared to peers indicate areas where it needs to improve to maintain its competitive edge.
    • MS's high level of leverage may pose a risk to its financial stability.
    • MS's volatile growth pattern and deceleration in profitability growth suggest that its growth may be unsustainable in the long term.
  9. Overall Assessment:
    • Overall, MS's financial health is mixed. While it has a strong market position, strong earnings performance, and strong revenue growth, it also has lower profitability, lower efficiency in generating returns, and lower cash flow generation compared to its peers. Its high level of leverage may also pose a risk to its financial stability.
    • MS holds a strong competitive position within its peer group and the broader industry, considering its market cap and financial performance. Its size advantage and strong revenue growth suggest a dominant market presence. However, its lower profitability and efficiency compared to peers indicate areas where it needs to improve to maintain its competitive edge.