Thematic evaluation
Back to company overview

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)

October 01, 2024

Compared to: Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | Intel Corp. (INTC) | Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK)

Our reasoning

Micron's current valuation appears to be fair, balancing strong growth prospects and improving financial performance against above-average valuation multiples and industry cyclicality risks. While the company's leadership in memory technologies and exposure to high-growth markets like AI and data centers support a premium valuation, the potential for industry oversupply and geopolitical risks temper excessive optimism.

Key takeaways
  • Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) is a leading global provider of memory and storage solutions with a strong market position and competitive advantage.
  • The company is experiencing a strong recovery in revenue and profitability, driven by robust demand in the data center and the company's successful execution on its product roadmap.
  • MU's financial performance is strong, with improving profitability, strong cash flow generation, and a solid liquidity position.
  • The company is making strategic investments to expand its leading-edge manufacturing capabilities and support its growth strategy.
  • Key risks include volatility in pricing and margins, geopolitical and regulatory challenges, intense competition, ability to develop new technologies, supply chain constraints, and legal/IP disputes.
  • MU's valuation is currently above the industry average, reflecting the company's strong growth prospects and profitability. However, the company's valuation is also sensitive to changes in industry dynamics and macroeconomic conditions.
  • Overall, MU is a high-growth, high-risk investment that has the potential for significant returns but also carries the risk of significant losses.
Fairly valued
Ask a question about Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
Evaluation summary

  1. Company Overview:

    • Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) is a leading global provider of innovative memory and storage solutions, including DRAM, NAND, and NOR memory products. The company operates through four business units: Compute and Networking (CNBU), Mobile (MBU), Embedded (EBU), and Storage (SBU).
    • MU's key customers include major cloud, enterprise, mobile, and consumer electronics companies, as well as automotive and industrial customers. The company faces intense competition from other major semiconductor memory and storage providers like Samsung, SK hynix, and Western Digital.
    • We are using the Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) as a benchmark for price performance comparison and Intel Corp. (INTC) and Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) as industry peers for comparative analysis.

  2. Financial Performance:

    • MU's revenue has experienced significant growth in recent quarters, driven by robust demand in the data center and the company's successful execution on its product roadmap. Revenue growth is outpacing the industry average, indicating a strong market position and competitive advantage.
    • Profitability is improving significantly, driven by higher pricing and improved product mix. Gross margin, operating margin, and net profit margin are all improving, indicating a strong focus on profitability.
    • ROA, ROE, and ROIC are all above the industry average, indicating strong profitability relative to its assets and equity.
    • Compared to its peers, MU has consistently outperformed both INTC and ADI over the past three years, with significantly higher annualized returns. However, MU's performance has been more volatile than INTC's and ADI's, with more frequent and larger drawdowns.

  3. Operational Efficiency:

    • MU's asset utilization efficiency is improving, as evidenced by the increasing trends in ROA, ROE, ROIC, and return on average invested capital.
    • Working capital management efficiency is improving, as evidenced by the decreasing trend in changes in working capital.
    • Cash flow generation is strong, with a high free cash flow margin and a high cash flow/total debt ratio.
    • Capital expenditures are increasing, reflecting the company's commitment to expanding its manufacturing capabilities and supporting its growth strategy.
    • The company's focus on organic growth is reflected in the decreasing trend in purchase and sale of investments.
    • Compared to its peers, ADI has consistently offered a better risk-adjusted return than MU and INTC, as indicated by its higher Sharpe ratio. This suggests that ADI has been a more efficient investment, generating higher returns for a given level of risk.
    • MU's beta has generally been higher than INTC's and ADI's, suggesting that it is more sensitive to market movements. This indicates that MU is a riskier investment than its peers, as its price is likely to fluctuate more in response to market changes.
    • MU's liquidity position is strong, with a current ratio and quick ratio above the industry average.
    • The company's long-term solvency is also strong, with a low debt-to-equity ratio and a debt/EBITDA ratio below the industry average.

  4. Growth Opportunities:

    • MU is making strategic investments to expand its leading-edge manufacturing capabilities in the U.S., supported by government incentives, which could position it well for future growth.
    • The company is ramping production of its 1-beta DRAM and G8/G9 NAND nodes, which will become an increasing portion of the company's mix through FY2025.
    • MU is focused on translating AI-driven opportunities into value for stakeholders, citing multiple vectors that will drive AI memory demand.
    • The company is focused on disciplined capital spending and inventory management to align supply with demand.
    • Management has expressed confidence in the company's ability to deliver a substantial revenue record and significantly improved profitability in FY2025, driven by its technology leadership, strong customer relationships, and favorable industry dynamics.

  5. Risks and Threats:

    • Key risks include volatility in pricing and margins, geopolitical and regulatory challenges, intense competition, ability to develop new technologies, supply chain constraints, and legal/IP disputes.
    • The decreasing trend in shareholders' equity and retained earnings could be a concern, as it suggests that the company is not reinvesting enough of its profits back into the business.
    • The increasing trend in long-term debt suggests that the company is relying more on debt financing for growth, which could increase its financial risk in the future.
    • The company's reliance on a select number of key customers, including international customers, could expose it to risks related to geopolitical events and trade disputes.
    • The company's operations are subject to intense competition in the semiconductor memory and storage markets, which could put pressure on pricing and margins.

  6. Valuation Analysis:

    • MU's valuation metrics, such as P/E and EV/EBITDA, are currently above the industry average, reflecting the company's strong growth prospects and profitability.
    • However, the company's valuation is also sensitive to changes in industry dynamics and macroeconomic conditions.
    • Potential catalysts for future growth include the increasing adoption of AI and cloud computing, the expansion of the data center market, and the development of new memory technologies.

  7. Price Performance:

    • MU has exhibited a mixed performance history compared to XLK. While MU has outperformed XLK over longer periods like 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, it has underperformed in shorter periods like 3 months and 6 months. This suggests that MU's performance is cyclical and influenced by factors like market volatility and industry trends.
    • Compared to its peers, MU has consistently outperformed both INTC and ADI over the past three years, with significantly higher annualized returns. However, MU's performance has been more volatile than INTC's and ADI's, with more frequent and larger drawdowns.
    • MU has generally provided higher annualized returns than XLK, indicating a potential for greater growth. However, MU has also been significantly more volatile than XLK, suggesting a higher risk profile. This is further supported by MU's larger maximum drawdown compared to XLK, indicating a greater susceptibility to price declines.

  8. Future Outlook:

    • Management expects a healthy supply-demand environment in both DRAM and NAND in 2025, supported by industry-wide capacity reductions and the increasing mix of high-value products like HBM, high-capacity DRAMs, and data center SSDs.
    • The company expects revenue to set a new record with significantly improved profitability and free cash flow in FY2025.
    • Analyst estimates for MU's future performance are generally positive, with consensus expectations for continued revenue growth and margin expansion.

  9. Summary:

    • MU is a leading global provider of memory and storage solutions with a strong market position and competitive advantage. The company is experiencing a strong recovery in revenue and profitability, driven by robust demand in the data center and the company's successful execution on its product roadmap.
    • MU's financial performance is strong, with improving profitability, strong cash flow generation, and a solid liquidity position. The company is making strategic investments to expand its leading-edge manufacturing capabilities and support its growth strategy.
    • Key risks include volatility in pricing and margins, geopolitical and regulatory challenges, intense competition, ability to develop new technologies, supply chain constraints, and legal/IP disputes.
    • MU's valuation is currently above the industry average, reflecting the company's strong growth prospects and profitability. However, the company's valuation is also sensitive to changes in industry dynamics and macroeconomic conditions.
    • Overall, MU is a high-growth, high-risk investment that has the potential for significant returns but also carries the risk of significant losses. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and investment goals before investing in MU.
Peer fundamentals 
Fundamentals
Insights
  • Micron is experiencing a strong recovery in revenue and profitability, driven by robust demand in the data center and the company's successful execution on its product roadmap.
  • The company is effectively controlling operating expenses and improving its margins, indicating a strong focus on profitability.
  • Micron's liquidity position is strong, with a current ratio and quick ratio above the industry average.
  • The company's long-term solvency is also strong, with a low debt-to-equity ratio and a debt/EBITDA ratio below the industry average.
  • The company's asset utilization efficiency is improving, as evidenced by the increasing trends in return on average assets, return on average total equity, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital.
  • Micron's cash flow generation is strong, with a high free cash flow margin and a high cash flow/total debt ratio.
  • The company's capital expenditures are increasing, reflecting its commitment to expanding its manufacturing capabilities and supporting its growth strategy.
  • The company's focus on organic growth is reflected in the decreasing trend in purchase and sale of investments.
  • The decreasing trend in shareholders' equity and retained earnings could be a concern, as it suggests that the company is not reinvesting enough of its profits back into the business.
  • The increasing trend in long-term debt suggests that the company is relying more on debt financing for growth, which could increase its financial risk in the future.
  • Micron's strong financial performance and favorable industry dynamics suggest that the company is well-positioned for continued growth in the coming quarters.
  • The company's strategic investments in leading-edge manufacturing capabilities and product development are likely to drive future growth.
  • The company's focus on disciplined capital spending and inventory management is likely to contribute to its continued profitability.
Analysis
  • Revenue - Micron's revenue is experiencing strong growth, driven by robust demand in the data center and the company's successful execution on its product roadmap. - The company's revenue growth is outpacing the industry average, indicating a strong market position and competitive advantage. - The company's strategic investments in leading-edge manufacturing capabilities and product development are likely to drive future revenue growth.
    • Profitability
      • Micron's profitability is improving significantly, driven by higher pricing and improved product mix.
      • The company's gross margin, operating margin, and net profit margin are all improving, indicating a strong focus on profitability.
      • The company's return on average assets, return on average total equity, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital are all above the industry average, indicating strong profitability relative to its assets and equity.
    • Liquidity
      • Micron's liquidity position appears to be strong, with a current ratio and quick ratio above the industry average.
      • However, the decreasing trend in cash and short-term investments suggests that the company is utilizing its cash for investments and operations.
    • Solvency
      • Micron's long-term solvency appears to be strong, with a low debt-to-equity ratio and a debt/EBITDA ratio below the industry average.
      • The company's cash flow/total debt ratio is significantly above the industry average, indicating a strong ability to service its debt obligations.
      • However, the increasing trend in long-term debt suggests that the company is relying more on debt financing for growth, which could increase its financial risk in the future.
    • Operational Efficiency
      • Micron's asset utilization efficiency is improving, as evidenced by the increasing trends in return on average assets, return on average total equity, return on average total capital, and return on average invested capital.
      • The company's working capital management efficiency is improving, as evidenced by the decreasing trend in changes in working capital.
    • Cash Flow Analysis
      • Micron's cash flow generation is strong, with a high free cash flow margin and a high cash flow/total debt ratio.
      • The company's capital expenditures are increasing, reflecting its commitment to expanding its manufacturing capabilities and supporting its growth strategy.
      • The company's focus on organic growth is reflected in the decreasing trend in purchase and sale of investments.
    • Risk Factors
      • The decreasing trend in shareholders' equity and retained earnings could be a concern, as it suggests that the company is not reinvesting enough of its profits back into the business.
      • The increasing trend in long-term debt suggests that the company is relying more on debt financing for growth, which could increase its financial risk in the future.
      • The company's reliance on a select number of key customers, including international customers, could expose it to risks related to geopolitical events and trade disputes.
      • The company's operations are subject to intense competition in the semiconductor memory and storage markets, which could put pressure on pricing and margins.
    • Future Outlook
      • Micron's strong financial performance and favorable industry dynamics suggest that the company is well-positioned for continued growth in the coming quarters.
      • The company's strategic investments in leading-edge manufacturing capabilities and product development are likely to drive future growth.
      • The company's focus on disciplined capital spending and inventory management is likely to contribute to its continued profitability.
Most recent earnings report
Financial statements 
All public filings
Comparative Analysis
Benchmarks (as of 2024-09-27)
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK)
  • Performance Comparison: MU has exhibited a mixed performance history compared to XLK. While MU has outperformed XLK over longer periods like 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, it has underperformed in shorter periods like 3 months and 6 months. This suggests that MU's performance is cyclical and influenced by factors like market volatility and industry trends.
  • Risk and Return Analysis: MU has generally provided higher annualized returns than XLK, indicating a potential for greater growth. However, MU has also been significantly more volatile than XLK, suggesting a higher risk profile. This is further supported by MU's larger maximum drawdown compared to XLK, indicating a greater susceptibility to price declines.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance: XLK has consistently offered a better risk-adjusted return than MU, as evidenced by its higher Sharpe ratio. This suggests that XLK has been more efficient in generating returns relative to its risk. MU's higher beta further reinforces its higher risk profile, indicating that it is more sensitive to market movements.
  • Overall Assessment: MU has demonstrated a strong track record of growth and value creation over the past few years, evidenced by its higher annualized returns. However, its higher volatility and larger drawdowns suggest a higher risk profile compared to XLK. While MU's recent performance has been mixed, its long-term growth potential remains attractive. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and investment horizon before investing in MU.
Peers Price History(as of 2024-09-27)
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI)Intel Corp. (INTC)
  • Performance Comparison:
    • MU has consistently outperformed both INTC and ADI over the past three years, with significantly higher annualized returns. This suggests that MU has been a strong performer in the long term, particularly during periods of market uncertainty.
    • However, MU's performance has been more volatile than INTC's and ADI's, with more frequent and larger drawdowns. This suggests that MU is a riskier investment than its peers.
  • Risk and Return Analysis:
    • MU has provided higher annualized returns than INTC and ADI over the past three years, indicating that it has been a more profitable investment.
    • However, MU has also been more volatile than INTC and ADI, with higher annualized volatility. This suggests that MU is a riskier investment than its peers.
    • MU's maximum drawdown of 49.27% is significantly higher than the maximum drawdowns of INTC (69.57%) and ADI (24.85%), indicating that MU is more susceptible to significant price declines than its peers.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:
    • ADI has consistently offered a better risk-adjusted return than MU and INTC, as indicated by its higher Sharpe ratio. This suggests that ADI has been a more efficient investment, generating higher returns for a given level of risk.
    • MU's beta has generally been higher than INTC's and ADI's, suggesting that it is more sensitive to market movements. This indicates that MU is a riskier investment than its peers, as its price is likely to fluctuate more in response to market changes.
  • Overall Assessment:
    • MU has been a strong performer in the long term, with consistently higher returns than INTC and ADI. However, it has also been more volatile and riskier than its peers, with more frequent and larger drawdowns.
    • ADI has consistently offered a better risk-adjusted return than MU and INTC, as indicated by its higher Sharpe ratio. This suggests that ADI has been a more efficient investment, generating higher returns for a given level of risk.
    • MU's higher beta suggests that it is a riskier investment than INTC and ADI, as its price is likely to fluctuate more in response to market changes.
    • Overall, MU is a high-growth, high-risk investment that has the potential for significant returns but also carries the risk of significant losses. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and investment goals before investing in MU.
Peers Fundamentals(as of 2024-08-31)
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI)Intel Corp. (INTC)

  1. Market Position and Size:

    • MU is the largest company in its peer group, with a market cap significantly larger than INTC and ADI.
    • Despite having lower revenue and EBITDA than INTC, MU's market cap is significantly higher, suggesting that the market may be placing a higher valuation on its future growth potential, profitability, or other factors.
    • This indicates that MU holds a significant market position within the semiconductor industry.

  2. Profitability and Efficiency:

    • MU exhibits strong profitability, with EBITDA Margin and Net Profit Margin exceeding both peer and industry averages.
    • Its profitability is comparable to ADI, despite being a larger company, suggesting that it is able to maintain profitability at scale.
    • MU's efficiency in generating returns is also strong, with ROA, ROE, ROTC, and ROIC exceeding peer and industry averages.
    • However, its profitability and return metrics are lower than ADI's, suggesting that it may have room for improvement in its cost structure and asset utilization.

  3. Financial Health and Stability:

    • MU demonstrates strong financial health, with a solid track record of profitability, cash flow generation, and growth.
    • Its liquidity and solvency metrics are strong, exceeding both peer and industry averages, indicating its ability to meet its short-term obligations and manage its debt effectively.
    • While its debt levels are slightly higher than industry norms, they are still relatively low compared to its peers.

  4. Valuation and Market Perception:

    • MU's valuation metrics are mixed, with a high P/E ratio suggesting a premium valuation, but its EV/EBITDA and other valuation metrics indicating a discount compared to peers and the industry average.
    • This suggests that the market may be placing a higher valuation on MU's future growth potential or other factors, but its valuation may be lower than its peers and the industry average.

  5. Cash Flow and Capital Management:

    • MU generates strong cash flow from operations, exceeding its peers on a relative basis.
    • Its capital expenditure is lower than its peers, suggesting that it may be investing more in growth opportunities or other initiatives.
    • Its free cash flow is positive and exceeds INTC on a relative basis, but lower than ADI, suggesting that it may be investing more in growth opportunities or other initiatives.

  6. Growth and Future Prospects:

    • MU exhibits strong growth in key metrics like EBITDA, Net Income, and Free Cash Flow, consistently exceeding the peer group average.
    • Its growth rates have been consistently increasing over the 5-year period, suggesting that its growth is sustainable and likely to continue in the future.
    • Its growth is balanced across different metrics, with strong growth in profitability, cash flow, and revenue, indicating a healthy and sustainable growth trajectory.
    • Overall, MU's growth profile is strong, with a positive outlook for future growth.

  7. Potential for Investment:

    • MU's strong financial performance, growth potential, and competitive position make it an attractive investment opportunity.
    • Its superior profitability, cash flow generation, and growth rates suggest that it is well-positioned to continue generating value for shareholders.
    • While its valuation metrics are mixed, its strong fundamentals and growth prospects may justify a premium valuation.

  8. Key Risks and Considerations:

    • Cyclical industry trends: The semiconductor industry is cyclical, and MU's performance may be affected by economic downturns or changes in demand.
    • Competition: The semiconductor industry is highly competitive, and MU faces competition from established players like INTC and ADI, as well as emerging players.
    • Technological advancements: The semiconductor industry is constantly evolving, and MU needs to invest in research and development to stay ahead of the curve.

  9. Overall Assessment:

    • MU is a financially strong and well-positioned company within the semiconductor industry. Its strong profitability, cash flow generation, and growth trajectory suggest a healthy and sustainable financial position.
    • While its valuation metrics are mixed, its strong fundamentals and growth prospects may justify a premium valuation.
    • Investors should consider the potential risks associated with its business, such as cyclical industry trends, competition, and technological advancements.