Back to company overview

PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)

Add to research
March 30, 2025Fairly valued
Compared to:

Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST) | Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) | Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP)

Key takeaways
View more

PepsiCo's current valuation appears fair, balancing its strong market position and growth opportunities against financial risks and market challenges. While the low EV/EBITDA ratio suggests potential undervaluation, this is offset by high debt levels and declining profitability margins. The company's robust brand portfolio and international growth prospects provide support for the current valuation, but ongoing margin pressures and changing consumer preferences present risks that justify a cautious valuation stance.

  • PepsiCo's revenue growth is decelerating, indicating potential market saturation or increased competition, as evidenced by the slowing growth rate from Q1 2024 to Q4 2024.
  • Profitability margins (gross and net) are declining, suggesting increasing cost pressures or pricing challenges, with gross profit margin decreasing from 56.06% in Q2 2024 to 53.01% in Q4 2024.
  • The company's debt-to-equity ratio is significantly higher than the industry average, indicating a high level of financial leverage, with a ratio ranging from 231.03 to 264.68 compared to the industry average of 124.66.
  • PepsiCo has underperformed the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) and key peers like Monster Beverage Corp. and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. over the past year, indicating relative market weakness.
  • Management guidance for 2025 includes low-single-digit organic sales growth, reflecting a cautious outlook due to global economic uncertainty, as highlighted in the February 4, 2025 earnings call.
  • The company is strategically focused on international growth, particularly in developing and emerging markets, to drive future revenue, as emphasized in the earnings call.
  • Analysts are concerned about the return on investment of recent reinvestments in Frito-Lay, particularly given decelerating volumes, indicating a need for more effective capital allocation.
  • Recent acquisitions, such as Siete, demonstrate a strategic focus on expanding the convenient foods business and diversifying product offerings, aligning with changing consumer preferences.
  • Negative working capital indicates potential inefficiencies in managing short-term assets and liabilities, ranging from -$3.46 billion to -$5.77 billion.
  • The company's ROA, ROE, and ROIC are all significantly higher than the industry average, indicating strong profitability. However, the decreasing trends in these ratios suggest potential challenges in maintaining this level of profitability.
Evaluation summary
Add to research
View more

  1. Company Overview:

    • PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is a global leader in the food and beverage industry, manufacturing, marketing, distributing, and selling a wide range of beverages, food, and snacks. Key brands include Lay's, Doritos, Cheetos, Gatorade, Pepsi-Cola, Mountain Dew, and Quaker.
    • The company operates through seven segments: Frito-Lay North America (FLNA), Quaker Foods North America (QFNA), PepsiCo Beverages North America (PBNA), Latin America (LatAm), Europe, Africa, Middle East and South Asia (AMESA), and Asia Pacific, Australia and New Zealand and China Region (APAC). While specific revenue breakdowns by segment are not provided, the SEC filings emphasize the global reach and diversified product portfolio.
    • The benchmarks used for comparative analysis include the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP), and industry peers include Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE).

  2. Financial Performance:

    • PepsiCo's revenue has shown growth, with quarterly revenues of $18.25 billion, $22.50 billion, $23.32 billion, and $27.78 billion for the quarters ending March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, August 31, 2024, and December 31, 2024, respectively. However, the rate of revenue increase appears to be decelerating.
    • Gross profit margins have been consistently high, ranging from 53.01% to 56.06% across the four quarters, significantly exceeding the industry average of 25.63%. However, the gross profit margin decreased from 56.06% in Q2 2024 to 53.01% in Q4 2024.
    • Net profit margins have also been strong, ranging from 5.48% to 13.70% across the four quarters, also exceeding the industry average of -4.18%. The net profit margin decreased from 13.70% in Q2 2024 to 5.48% in Q4 2024.
    • Return on Assets (ROA) ranged from 9.34% to 9.74%, Return on Equity (ROE) ranged from 48.91% to 52.42%, and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) ranged from 16.43% to 17.34%. These figures are significantly higher than the industry averages of -1.35%, -5.07%, and -3.67% respectively, indicating strong profitability. However, these ratios have shown a slight decreasing trend throughout the year.

  3. Operational Efficiency:

    • Total assets have remained relatively stable, fluctuating between $99.47 billion and $100.51 billion. Total liabilities have also been stable, ranging from $79.95 billion to $81.30 billion.
    • Working capital has been negative, ranging from -$3.46 billion to -$5.77 billion, indicating potential inefficiencies in managing short-term assets and liabilities.
    • Net operating cash flow has been positive and increasing, from -$1.04 billion in Q1 2024 to $6.29 billion in Q4 2024, indicating a healthy short-term liquidity position.
    • Free cash flow margin has fluctuated, ranging from -0.09 to 0.16, with a margin of 0.14 in Q4 2024.
    • Total capital expenditure has increased from $614 million in Q1 2024 to $2.47 billion in Q4 2024. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization have also increased, from $768 million to $1.26 billion over the same period.
    • Cash dividends paid have been substantial, ranging from $1.74 billion to $1.86 billion per quarter. The company also engages in share repurchases, returning $8.2 billion to shareholders in 2024.
    • The current ratio has ranged from 0.82 to 0.89, and the quick ratio has ranged from 0.64 to 0.70, both lower than the industry averages of 1.95 and 1.02, respectively.
    • The total debt to total equity ratio has been high, ranging from 231.03 to 264.68, significantly higher than the industry average of 124.66, indicating a high level of financial leverage. The debt/EBITDA ratio has been relatively stable, ranging from 2.45 to 2.53.

  4. Growth Opportunities:

    • PepsiCo is focused on international growth, particularly in developing and emerging markets, as highlighted in the earnings call. Management emphasized the significant growth opportunity in international markets, indicating continued investment in this area.
    • The company is investing in innovation, including new products and healthier options, to adapt to changing consumer preferences. The earnings call mentioned a focus on "positive choices" or healthier options within its product portfolio.
    • PepsiCo is expanding into new market spaces, particularly the away-from-home market for snacks.
    • The company is also focused on improving North American performance through innovation, expansion into away-from-home channels, and enhanced price/pack architecture.
    • Recent acquisitions, such as Siete, demonstrate a strategic focus on expanding the convenient foods business and diversifying product offerings.

  5. Recent Developments and Market Sentiment:

    • The earnings call on February 4, 2025, revealed a cautious outlook for 2025 due to global economic uncertainty, despite strong international performance. Management provided low-single-digit organic sales growth guidance for 2025.
    • Analysts questioned the return on investment of recent reinvestments in Frito-Lay, particularly given decelerating volumes. Concerns were raised about the balance between tactical and strategic investments and the potential need for more aggressive price investments.
    • The company's recent acquisitions of Sabra and Siete demonstrate its strategic focus on expanding its convenient foods business and diversifying its product offerings. The Tropicana divestiture also reflects PepsiCo's efforts to optimize its portfolio and focus on higher-growth segments.

  6. Risks and Threats:

    • Key risks include changing consumer preferences, damage to the company's reputation, product quality and safety issues, and inability to compete effectively.
    • Macroeconomic factors, including inflation, interest rate changes, and geopolitical instability, pose risks and could impact PepsiCo's financial performance.
    • Supply chain disruptions and increased commodity, packaging, transportation, and labor costs are also significant threats.
    • The increasing debt levels are a significant risk factor, as they could limit the company's financial flexibility in the future.
    • Regulatory changes, such as the imposition of new taxes or restrictions on certain ingredients or packaging, pose risks and could impact PepsiCo's financial performance.

  7. Valuation Analysis:

    • The Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio has ranged from 13.61 to 15.66, lower than the industry average of 23.45. The Enterprise Value to Sales ratio has ranged from 2.71 to 3.06, higher than the industry average of 2.10.
    • Potential catalysts include successful execution of strategic initiatives, such as international growth and innovation, as well as improved performance in North America. Headwinds include global economic uncertainty, increasing debt levels, and changing consumer preferences.

  8. Price Performance:

    • PepsiCo's stock price has fluctuated in recent months, with a general upward trend followed by a decline. The price ranged from approximately $142 to $156 between January 29, 2025, and March 28, 2025.
    • PepsiCo has generally underperformed the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) and industry peers like Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) over the past year.

  9. Future Outlook:

    • Management guidance for 2025 includes low-single-digit organic sales growth. The company expects higher net interest expense due to debt rollover at higher rates and increased debt balances from recent acquisitions.
    • Analysts are focused on Frito-Lay's performance, investment returns, and the company's 2025 guidance.
    • The company's future performance will be influenced by its ability to manage debt, adapt to changing consumer preferences, and improve operational efficiency.

  10. Summary:

    • PepsiCo is a diversified global leader in the food and beverage industry with strong profitability and cash flow generation. However, the company faces challenges including decelerating revenue growth, declining profitability margins, increasing debt levels, and underperformance compared to benchmarks and peers.
    • SWOT Analysis:
      • Strengths: Diversified product portfolio, global presence, strong cash flow generation, high gross and EBITDA margins compared to industry average.
      • Weaknesses: Decelerating revenue growth, declining profitability margins, high debt levels, negative working capital, underperformance compared to benchmarks and peers.
      • Opportunities: International growth, innovation, expansion into new market spaces, strategic acquisitions.
      • Threats: Changing consumer preferences, macroeconomic headwinds, supply chain disruptions, increasing competition, regulatory changes.
    • Overall financial health is stable but requires monitoring due to increasing debt and declining profitability margins.
    • Critical factors for future performance include managing debt, adapting to changing consumer preferences, improving operational efficiency, and successfully executing strategic initiatives.
    • Areas requiring further monitoring include revenue growth, profitability margins, debt levels, and Frito-Lay's performance.
    • PepsiCo presents a mixed investment profile. While it offers stability due to its diversified product portfolio and global presence, its underperformance compared to benchmarks and peers, increasing debt levels, and declining profitability margins raise concerns. The company's growth potential is balanced against identified risks, and its position relative to industry trends requires careful monitoring. Potential catalysts include successful execution of strategic initiatives, while headwinds include global economic uncertainty and changing consumer preferences.
Price history
Add to research
View more
Fundamentals
Add to research
View more
Insights
  • PepsiCo's revenue growth is strong, but it is decelerating.
  • The company is not effectively controlling operating expenses in relation to revenue growth.
  • Overall profitability is decreasing.
  • The company's ROA, ROE, ROTC, and ROIC are all significantly higher than the industry average, indicating strong profitability. However, the decreasing trends in these ratios suggest potential challenges in maintaining this level of profitability.
  • The company has a strong liquidity position, but the decreasing working capital and other current assets suggest potential areas for improvement in short-term financial health.
  • The company's solvency is a concern due to the increasing debt levels.
  • The company's strong cash flow generation and profitability provide some cushion.
  • The company's total debt to total equity ratio is significantly higher than the industry average, indicating a high level of financial leverage.
  • The company's debt/EBITDA ratio is lower than the industry average, suggesting a lower level of debt relative to its earnings than its peers.
  • The company's gross profit margin and EBITDA margin are significantly higher than the industry average, indicating efficient operations and strong profitability. However, the decreasing trends in these ratios suggest potential challenges in maintaining this level of profitability.
  • The company's cash flow from operations is strong and increasing, indicating a healthy short-term liquidity position.
  • The company's strong free cash flow generation and debt repayment capacity suggest a solid long-term solvency position.
  • The company is actively investing in its business, as evidenced by the increasing capital expenditures.
  • The company is also engaging in acquisitions, as reflected in the increasing net assets from acquisitions.
  • The company is returning value to shareholders through dividends, as indicated by the increasing cash dividends paid.
  • The increasing debt levels are a significant risk factor, as they could limit the company's financial flexibility in the future.
  • The company's reliance on debt financing could increase its risk of financial distress if its profitability declines.
  • The company's decreasing working capital and other current assets suggest potential areas for improvement in short-term financial health.
  • The company's decelerating revenue growth and declining profitability are also concerns.
  • The company's future revenue growth is expected to be driven by international markets.
  • The company expects to improve North American performance gradually throughout the year.
Analysis
  • Revenue - PepsiCo's revenue growth is strong, but it is decelerating. This could be a sign of slowing demand or increasing competition. - The company's revenue growth is likely driven by pricing initiatives and productivity savings, as mentioned in the SEC filings. - Future revenue growth is expected to be driven by international markets, as mentioned in the earnings call. - The company expects to improve North American performance gradually throughout the year, as mentioned in the earnings call.
    • Profitability
      • PepsiCo's profitability is decreasing, as evidenced by the declining gross margin, operating margin, and net margin.
      • The company is not effectively controlling operating expenses in relation to revenue growth.
      • The company's ROA, ROE, ROTC, and ROIC are all significantly higher than the industry average, indicating strong profitability. However, the decreasing trends in these ratios suggest potential challenges in maintaining this level of profitability.
    • Liquidity
      • PepsiCo has a strong liquidity position, as evidenced by the increasing cash and short-term investments.
      • The decreasing working capital and other current assets suggest potential areas for improvement in short-term financial health.
      • The company's current ratio and quick ratio are lower than the industry average, suggesting a lower level of liquidity than its peers. However, the company's strong cash flow generation provides some cushion.
    • Solvency
      • PepsiCo's solvency is a concern due to the increasing debt levels.
      • The company's strong cash flow generation and profitability provide some cushion.
      • The company's total debt to total equity ratio is significantly higher than the industry average, indicating a high level of financial leverage.
      • The company's debt/EBITDA ratio is lower than the industry average, suggesting a lower level of debt relative to its earnings than its peers.
    • Operational Efficiency
      • The decreasing intangible assets and inventories suggest potential improvements in asset utilization efficiency.
      • The company's gross profit margin and EBITDA margin are significantly higher than the industry average, indicating efficient operations and strong profitability. However, the decreasing trends in these ratios suggest potential challenges in maintaining this level of profitability.
    • Cash Flow Analysis
      • PepsiCo's cash flow from operations is strong and increasing, indicating a healthy short-term liquidity position.
      • The company's strong free cash flow generation and debt repayment capacity suggest a solid long-term solvency position.
      • The company is actively investing in its business, as evidenced by the increasing capital expenditures.
      • The company is also engaging in acquisitions, as reflected in the increasing net assets from acquisitions.
      • The company is returning value to shareholders through dividends, as indicated by the increasing cash dividends paid.
    • Risk Factors
      • The increasing debt levels are a significant risk factor, as they could limit the company's financial flexibility in the future.
      • The company's reliance on debt financing could increase its risk of financial distress if its profitability declines.
      • The company's decreasing working capital and other current assets suggest potential areas for improvement in short-term financial health.
      • The company's decelerating revenue growth and declining profitability are also concerns.
    • Future Outlook
      • The company's continued investments in its business, including acquisitions, are likely to lead to further increases in debt.
      • The company's focus on operational efficiency could lead to further improvements in cash flow from operations.
      • The company's strong cash flow generation should provide some financial flexibility, but the high level of debt could limit its options going forward.
      • The company's future revenue growth is expected to be driven by international markets.
      • The company expects to improve North American performance gradually throughout the year.
Financial statements
Add to research
View more
Loading...
Public filings
Add to research
View more
  • PepsiCo is a diversified global leader in the food and beverage industry, with a strong portfolio of iconic brands and a presence in over 200 countries. However, the company faces significant competitive pressures, regulatory risks, and macroeconomic headwinds that could impact its financial performance.
  • The company's recent acquisitions of Sabra and Siete demonstrate its strategic focus on expanding its convenient foods business and diversifying its product offerings. The Tropicana divestiture also reflects PepsiCo's efforts to optimize its portfolio and focus on higher-growth segments.
  • PepsiCo's ability to navigate changing consumer preferences, manage supply chain disruptions and input cost inflation, and execute on its productivity and transformation initiatives will be critical to its future success. Effective risk management, particularly around cybersecurity, legal/regulatory compliance, and international operations, will also be key.
  • The company's strong cash flow generation and shareholder return program provide financial flexibility, but the high level of debt and potential for credit rating downgrades could limit its financial options going forward.
  • Overall, PepsiCo appears to be taking proactive steps to adapt to industry trends and strengthen its competitive position, but it faces significant operational, financial, and strategic challenges that will require careful execution and vigilance to overcome.

Core Business and Operations:

  • PepsiCo is a leading global food and beverage company with a diverse portfolio of brands including Lay's, Doritos, Cheetos, Gatorade, Pepsi-Cola, Mountain Dew, Quaker, and SodaStream
  • The company operates through various channels, including authorized bottlers, contract manufacturers, and other third parties, to produce, market, distribute, and sell a wide array of beverages and convenient foods
  • PepsiCo has operations in over 200 countries and territories around the world, with its largest markets being the United States, Mexico, Russia, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Brazil
  • The company's operations are organized into seven reportable segments: Frito-Lay North America (FLNA), Quaker Foods North America (QFNA), PepsiCo Beverages North America (PBNA), Latin America (LatAm), Europe, Africa, Middle East and South Asia (AMESA), and Asia Pacific, Australia and New Zealand and China Region (APAC)

Industry and Market Trends:

  • The food and beverage industry is highly competitive, with PepsiCo facing competition from international beverage and convenient food companies, as well as regional, local, and private label manufacturers
  • The industry continues to be affected by disruption in the retail landscape, including the growth of e-commerce, hard discounters, and the increasing power of large retailers and buying groups
  • Regulatory changes, such as the imposition of new taxes or restrictions on certain ingredients or packaging, pose risks and could impact PepsiCo's financial performance
  • Macroeconomic factors, including inflation, interest rate changes, and geopolitical instability, have created a challenging operating environment and increased input costs

Recent Events:

  • In December 2024, PepsiCo acquired the remaining 50% ownership in Sabra Dipping Company, making it a wholly-owned subsidiary
  • In January 2025, PepsiCo announced the acquisition of Siete, a Mexican-American foods business, for approximately $1.2 billion
  • In 2022, PepsiCo sold its Tropicana, Naked, and other select juice brands to PAI Partners, while retaining a 39% noncontrolling interest in the newly formed Tropicana Brands Group (TBG)

Risk Factors:

  • Reduction in future demand for PepsiCo's products due to changing consumer preferences and trends
  • Damage to the company's reputation or brand image
  • Product quality and safety issues, including product recalls
  • Inability to compete effectively in the highly competitive food and beverage industry
  • Failure to attract, develop, and retain a skilled workforce
  • Water scarcity and the impact of climate change
  • Changes in the retail landscape and the increasing power of key customers
  • Disruptions to the company's manufacturing operations and supply chain, including increased commodity, packaging, transportation, labor, and other input costs
  • Political, social, and geopolitical instability in international markets
  • Inability to grow the business in developing and emerging markets
  • Changes in economic conditions, including high inflation and interest rates
  • Cyber incidents and other disruptions to the company's information systems
  • Failure to successfully complete or manage strategic transactions

Legal Matters:

  • PepsiCo is party to various litigation, claims, legal or regulatory proceedings, inquiries, and investigations related to product quality, environmental matters, and other issues, though management believes the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect

Management's Discussion and Analysis:

  • PepsiCo's net revenue grew 8% in 2024, driven by effective net pricing and productivity savings, partially offset by a decline in organic volume
  • Operating profit increased 8% in 2024, with margin improvement of 0.9 percentage points, reflecting the benefits of pricing and productivity initiatives
  • The company generated $12.5 billion in net cash from operating activities in 2024, with free cash flow of $7.0 billion
  • PepsiCo returned $8.2 billion to shareholders in 2024 through dividends and share repurchases, and expects to return approximately $8.6 billion in 2025
  • The company continues to invest in its 2019 Multi-Year Productivity Plan, which is expected to result in pre-tax charges of $6.15 billion through 2030
Earnings calls
Add to research
View more

Earnings Report 2024Q4 (2025-02-04)

Key takeaways
  1. Cautious Optimism: PepsiCo's guidance reflects a cautious outlook due to global economic uncertainty, despite strong international performance and plans to revitalize the North American business.
  2. Strategic Focus on Value and Health: The company is adapting to changing consumer preferences by emphasizing value-oriented pricing and healthier product options.
  3. International Markets as Growth Engine: International markets are expected to be a key driver of growth, providing flexibility for investments in other regions.
  4. Frito-Lay Recovery Key to Overall Performance: The success of the turnaround strategy for Frito-Lay is crucial for achieving the company's overall financial targets.
  5. Operational Efficiency and Productivity Remain Central: PepsiCo's commitment to ongoing productivity improvements will be vital in navigating cost pressures and maintaining profitability.
  6. Innovation and Away-From-Home Channels are Key Growth Opportunities: PepsiCo's strategic investments in innovation and expansion into away-from-home channels are expected to drive future growth.
  7. Market Volatility Presents Both Risks and Opportunities: The current macroeconomic environment presents both challenges and opportunities for PepsiCo, requiring a flexible and adaptable approach.
Focus of management’s prepared remarks
  • International Growth: Management highlighted the significant growth opportunity in international markets, emphasizing the substantial size and profitability of this segment. They indicated continued investment in this area.
  • Productivity Initiatives: The company underscored its ongoing multi-year productivity programs aimed at improving efficiency through automation, digitalization, and simplification.
  • North America Strategy: Management outlined a plan to improve North American performance through innovation, expansion into away-from-home channels, and enhanced price/pack architecture.
  • Long-Term Growth Targets: The company reaffirmed its commitment to its long-term organic sales growth guidance of 4% to 6%.
Focus of the analyst Q&A
  • Frito-Lay Performance and Investment: Analysts questioned the return on investment of recent reinvestments in Frito-Lay, particularly given decelerating volumes. Concerns were raised about the balance between tactical and strategic investments and the potential need for more aggressive price investments.
  • 2025 Guidance and Investment Levels: Analysts sought clarification on the drivers of the company's 2025 EPS guidance, specifically questioning the level of planned investments and the implications for leverage. The use of an EPS range instead of a percentage increase was also questioned.
  • Restructuring and M&A: Analysts inquired about the potential implications of the company's restructuring efforts, including the possibility of a future split of the beverage and snack businesses and the impact on future M&A activity.
  • North America Business Strategies: Analysts pressed for more granular details on the company's plans to manage its North American businesses differently in 2025 compared to the previous year, focusing on specific strategies for Frito-Lay and beverages, including innovation and other strategic tweaks. Performance in Mexico was also a point of inquiry.
  • Frito-Lay's "Positive Choices" Strategy: Analysts explored the reasons behind the slowdown in Frito-Lay's performance, questioning the relative importance of pricing, changing consumer preferences towards healthier options, and the role of Frito-Lay in the mini-meals market.
  • North America Sales Growth and Timing: Analysts sought clarification on the company's low-single-digit organic sales guidance for 2025, specifically asking about the contribution from international markets versus North America and the expected timing of improvement in North America.
  • Salty Snack Category Dynamics: Analysts inquired about the factors contributing to the choppy growth in the salty snack category and the company's confidence in the category's future prospects.
  • Frito-Lay Pricing Strategy: Analysts probed the company's pricing strategy for Frito-Lay, questioning the potential for negative pricing and the risks of not investing more aggressively in price to stimulate volume growth.
  • Frito-Lay Spending and Marketing: Analysts sought further clarification on the nature of the investments made in Frito-Lay, particularly regarding infrastructure improvements and the company's expectations for advertising and marketing spending in 2025.
  • Energy Drinks Category: Analysts asked about the company's outlook for the energy drinks category and its plans to drive growth in this segment.
  • PBNA Pricing and Promotion: Analysts sought details on the pricing and promotional strategies for PepsiCo Beverages North America (PBNA) in 2025. The incrementality of Baja Blast and the overall Mountain Dew franchise strategy were also points of interest.
  • Impact of GLP Medications and Protein Drinks: Analysts inquired about the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on salty snack consumption and the company's interest in expanding its presence in the growing protein drinks market.
  • European Performance and Sustainability: Analysts sought to understand the drivers of the successful volume growth in Europe despite pricing normalization and whether this performance is sustainable. The potential for international profits to fund investments in North America was also discussed.
  • Long-Term Organic Sales Guidance: Analysts asked for a level-set on the company's longer-term organic sales guidance of 4% to 6%, seeking clarification on the company's confidence in achieving this target given recent challenges in the snacks business.
Summary
  1. Financial Performance

PepsiCo's Q4 2024 earnings call revealed a mixed performance. While specific numerical data is absent from the provided transcript, management highlighted "low-single-digit organic sales growth" guidance for 2025, a figure described as being in line with the Q4 exit rate. The company anticipates higher net interest expense due to debt rollover at higher rates and increased debt balances from recent acquisitions. Below-the-line items are expected to be a headwind, impacting EPS growth despite projected sector operating profit growth exceeding EPS guidance. Management expressed cautious optimism due to global economic volatility.

  1. Revenue Drivers

Revenue growth is projected to be driven by international markets, which are expected to remain resilient and contribute significantly to 2025 results. In North America, the company plans to improve performance gradually throughout the year by focusing on innovation, expanding into new market spaces (particularly away-from-home), and improving price/pack architecture. The Frito-Lay North America business experienced a slowdown in Q4 2024, with management attributing this to a combination of factors including value-seeking consumer behavior and a shift towards healthier options. The company is actively working to address these challenges.

  1. Profit Margins and Cost Management

Management emphasized ongoing multi-year productivity programs focused on automation, digitalization, and simplification to offset cost pressures. While specific margin figures are not provided, the company expects higher net interest expense and pension expense to impact overall profitability. The beverage business is targeting mid-teens margins. Management indicated a focus on improving operational efficiency across the entire value chain.

  1. Guidance and Outlook

The company provided low-single-digit organic sales growth guidance for 2025, reflecting a cautious outlook due to global economic uncertainty. Management highlighted the resilience of international markets as a key driver of growth. The guidance for EPS is presented as a range rather than a percentage increase, suggesting flexibility to adjust investment levels based on evolving market conditions. Foreign exchange rates, particularly the strengthening dollar, are expected to impact results.

  1. Strategic Initiatives

Key strategic initiatives include: reinvesting in the Frito-Lay business to regain momentum, focusing on innovation and value-oriented pricing strategies, expanding into the away-from-home market for snacks, and continuing to improve margins in the beverage business. The company is also emphasizing "positive choices" or healthier options within its product portfolio. Restructuring efforts are underway to improve operational efficiency and focus on international growth opportunities.

  1. Management Commentary

Management expressed cautious optimism about the outlook, acknowledging global economic uncertainty while highlighting the strength of international markets and the company's plans to improve North American performance. They emphasized the importance of value-oriented pricing, innovation, and operational efficiency. Management's tone suggests a proactive approach to addressing challenges while maintaining a long-term growth perspective.

  1. Industry and Market Conditions

The company noted a muted top-line growth environment in North America, particularly within the salty snack category. Management attributed this to factors such as inflation impacting consumer spending and a shift in consumer preferences towards healthier options. However, they expressed encouragement at signs of category growth returning in recent months. The company sees opportunities in the growing functional beverage and protein snack markets. The impact of GLP (glucagon-like peptide) medications on consumer behavior was discussed, with management indicating limited impact on their business at present.

Comparative analysis
Add to research
View more
Benchmarks (as of 2025-03-19)
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP)

  • Performance Comparison:

    • PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) has generally underperformed the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) across most of the analyzed periods. For example, the one-year performance shows PEP underperforming XLP by -18.09% with returns of -10.95% and 7.14% respectively. The two-year and three-year annualized returns also indicate underperformance, with PEP at -5.81% and -0.15% compared to XLP at 7.3% and 5.14% respectively. However, there was a one-month period where PEP overperformed XLP by 2.03%, with returns of 0.21% and -1.82% respectively.
    • The consistency of PEP's performance relative to XLP has been weak, with frequent periods of underperformance. The negative performance figures over the longer term suggest that PEP has not been as effective in generating returns compared to the broader consumer staples sector represented by XLP.

  • Risk and Return Analysis:

    • The annualized returns of PEP have been lower than those of XLP. The one-year annualized return for PEP is -10.95%, compared to 7.14% for XLP. This indicates that PEP has provided lower returns compared to the benchmark.
    • PEP has generally exhibited higher annualized volatility compared to XLP. For instance, in Q2 2022, PEP's volatility reached as high as 29.99%, while XLP peaked at 27.56%. This suggests that PEP is more volatile than the benchmark.
    • PEP experienced a maximum drawdown of -23.3% on 01/10/2025, while XLP had a maximum drawdown of -16.3% on 10/07/2022. This indicates that PEP has had more significant peak-to-trough declines than XLP, suggesting a higher risk profile.

  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:

    • The Sharpe ratios for PEP have generally been lower than those of XLP, indicating that PEP has not offered as good risk-adjusted returns. For example, in Q3 2024, PEP's Sharpe ratio ranged from -0.57 to 0.37, while XLP's Sharpe ratio ranged from 0.54 to 2.07.
    • The beta values for PEP have generally been below 1, indicating that PEP is less volatile than the overall market. However, the beta values have been lower than those of XLP, suggesting that PEP is less sensitive to market movements compared to the benchmark.

  • Overall Assessment:

    • Based on the analysis, PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) has generally underperformed the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) in terms of historical performance, annualized returns, and risk-adjusted returns. PEP has also exhibited higher volatility and larger drawdowns compared to XLP, indicating a higher risk profile.
    • A significant trend is the consistent underperformance of PEP relative to XLP over the analyzed periods. The lower Sharpe ratios and higher drawdowns suggest that PEP has not been as effective in generating returns relative to the risk taken, compared to the broader consumer staples sector. This could inform investment decisions by highlighting the potential benefits of diversifying into the broader sector rather than focusing solely on PEP.
Peers Price History(as of 2025-03-19)
Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST)Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE)

  • Performance Comparison:

    • PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) has generally underperformed both Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) across various time frames. For instance, over the past year, PEP's return was -10.95%, compared to -5.52% for MNST and a significantly higher 54.27% for COKE. This trend of underperformance is consistent over 2-year and 3-year periods as well.
    • PEP's performance is less volatile but consistently lower than its peers, indicating a more conservative investment profile.

  • Risk and Return Analysis:

    • The annualized returns for PEP are lower compared to MNST and COKE. Over a 3-year period, PEP's annualized return was -0.15%, while MNST's was 12.88% and COKE's was 40.54%. This suggests that PEP has not provided as high a return as its peers over the long term.
    • PEP's annualized volatility is generally lower than MNST and COKE. For example, in Q1 2022, PEP's volatility ranged from 21.32% to 22.06%, while MNST's ranged from 42.28% to 45.71% and COKE's ranged from 86.69% to 88.49%. This indicates that PEP is less prone to significant price swings.
    • PEP's maximum drawdown was -23.3% on 01/10/2025, which is less severe than MNST's -26.04% and COKE's -35.52%. This suggests that PEP is relatively less risky in terms of potential losses from peak to trough.

  • Risk-Adjusted Performance:

    • PEP's Sharpe Ratio is generally lower than COKE's, indicating that it offers a less favorable risk-adjusted return. For example, in Q1 2025, PEP's Sharpe ratio ranged from -0.78 to 0.03, while COKE's ranged from 1.35 to 1.84.
    • PEP's Beta is consistently below 1, indicating that it is less sensitive to market movements compared to MNST and COKE. In Q1 2025, PEP's beta ranged from -0.08 to 0.06, suggesting very low market sensitivity.

  • Overall Assessment:

    • PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) presents a lower-risk, lower-return profile compared to Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE). While PEP exhibits lower volatility and smaller drawdowns, its annualized returns and Sharpe ratios are also lower, indicating less efficient risk-adjusted performance.
    • Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) has demonstrated superior performance in terms of annualized returns and Sharpe ratios but also exhibits higher volatility and larger drawdowns, suggesting a higher-risk profile. Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST) falls in between, with moderate risk and return characteristics.
    • Recent trends indicate that PEP's sensitivity to market movements is very low, making it a potentially stable but less lucrative investment compared to its peers.
Peers Fundamentals(as of 2024-12-31)
Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST)Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE)

  1. Market Position and Size:

    • PepsiCo (PEP) stands out with a significantly larger market capitalization of $208.92 billion compared to Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST) at $53.75 billion and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) at $11.36 billion.
    • This substantial market cap is supported by PEP's higher revenue ($91.85 billion), gross income ($50.37 billion), EBITDA ($18.05 billion), and net income ($9.58 billion) compared to its peers.
    • PEP's dominant market position is evident through its diversified portfolio of beverage, food, and snack products, making it a leader in the consumer non-durables sector.

  2. Profitability and Efficiency:

    • PEP's gross profit margin of 54.84% is comparable to MNST (54.04%) and significantly higher than COKE (39.91%) and the industry average (25.63%), indicating strong cost management and pricing strategies.
    • While PEP's EBITDA margin (19.65%) is lower than MNST's (26.84%), it surpasses COKE's (16.17%) and the industry average (4.64%), reflecting efficient operations.
    • PEP's net profit margin of 10.43% is lower than MNST's (20.14%) but higher than COKE's (9.18%) and the industry average (-4.18%), showcasing effective cost control and profitability.
    • PEP's return on average assets (9.58%), return on average total equity (52.42%), return on average total capital (21.63%), and return on average invested capital (16.43%) are generally lower than its peers but significantly higher than the industry average, indicating efficient resource management.

  3. Financial Health and Stability:

    • PEP's current ratio (0.82) and quick ratio (0.65) are lower than its peers and the industry average, suggesting potential liquidity concerns.
    • PEP's total debt to total equity ratio (264.68) is significantly higher than its peers and the industry average, indicating a more leveraged balance sheet.
    • Despite higher debt levels, PEP's debt/EBITDA ratio (2.45) is manageable compared to the industry average (4.93), reflecting its ability to service its debt.
    • PEP's cash flow/total debt ratio (30.39%) is lower than its peers and the industry average, indicating a need for improved cash flow management relative to its debt obligations.

  4. Valuation and Market Perception:

    • PEP's enterprise value to sales ratio (2.71) is higher than the industry average (2.1), suggesting a premium valuation based on sales.
    • PEP's enterprise value to EBITDA ratio (13.61) is lower than the industry average (23.45), indicating a potentially undervalued earnings stream.
    • PEP's price-to-earnings ratio (21.92) is lower than MNST's (37.08) and the industry average (52.6) but higher than COKE's (20.73), suggesting a reasonable valuation compared to its earnings.
    • PEP's price-to-book ratio (11.58) is higher than its peers and the industry average, indicating a higher market value relative to its book value.
    • PEP's price-to-sales ratio (2.29) is lower than MNST's (7.47) but higher than COKE's (1.9) and the industry average (1.66), reflecting a moderate valuation based on sales.

  5. Cash Flow and Capital Management:

    • PEP's net operating cash flow ($12.51 billion) and free cash flow ($7.19 billion) are significantly higher than its peers, demonstrating strong cash generation capabilities.
    • PEP's total capital expenditure ($5.32 billion) is also substantially higher than its peers, indicating significant investments in its operations.
    • PEP's cash conversion ratio (0.24) is lower than its peers and the industry average, suggesting inefficiencies in converting sales into cash.

  6. Growth and Future Prospect:

    • PEP's revenue growth has been consistently lower than its peers, indicating potential challenges in market share gains.
    • PEP's free cash flow growth is also lower than its peers, which could limit its ability to invest in future growth opportunities.
    • PEP's 3-year CAGR for EBITDA and basic earnings per share are higher than MNST, indicating stronger recent growth in profitability.
    • PEP's net income and basic earnings per share growth rates have been consistently increasing over the 5-year period.
    • Comparing PEP's most recent year-over-year growth rates to its 5-year CAGRs reveals a deceleration trend in revenue and free cash flow growth but an acceleration trend in EBITDA, net income, basic earnings per share, and EBIT margin growth.

  7. Potential for Investment:

    • PEP presents a mixed investment profile. Its size, profitability, and cash flow generation make it an attractive investment option.
    • However, its lower liquidity, higher debt levels, and slower revenue growth compared to peers are potential drawbacks.
    • Investors should carefully consider PEP's valuation, growth potential, and risk profile relative to its peers and industry benchmarks before making an investment decision.

  8. Key Risks and Considerations:

    • PEP's higher debt levels and lower liquidity compared to peers pose financial risks.
    • Slower revenue growth compared to peers could indicate market share challenges.
    • Inefficiencies in converting sales into cash, as indicated by the lower cash conversion ratio, need to be addressed.
    • Potential deceleration in revenue and free cash flow growth trends warrants close monitoring.

  9. Overall Assessment:

    • PEP exhibits strong financial health, supported by its dominant market position, robust cash flow generation, and efficient equity utilization.
    • However, its lower liquidity, higher debt levels, and slower revenue growth compared to peers are areas that require attention.
    • PEP's overall financial performance and outlook are positive, but investors should carefully weigh the potential risks and challenges before making an investment decision.
Comparison metrics
Add to research
View more