Thematic evaluation
Back to company overview

Procter & Gamble Co. (PG)

October 01, 2024

Compared to: The Clorox Co. (CLX) | Colgate-Palmolive Co. (CL) | Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP)

Our reasoning

Procter & Gamble's current valuation appears to be fair, balancing its strong brand portfolio, consistent financial performance, and growth opportunities against macroeconomic headwinds and competitive pressures. While some metrics suggest slight undervaluation (e.g., core EPS growth, margin improvements), others indicate potential overvaluation (e.g., EV/Sales ratio). The current price seems to reflect a scenario between the base case and optimistic projections, suggesting limited near-term upside without exceeding expectations.

Key takeaways
  • PG's financial performance has been impacted by challenging macroeconomic conditions, particularly in certain Enterprise Markets.
  • The company's focus on productivity improvements, cost management, and disciplined capital allocation has enabled it to expand gross margins and maintain a strong liquidity position.
  • The Gillette impairment charge highlights the importance of closely monitoring the valuation of the company's key intangible assets.
  • P&G's commitment to innovation, brand building, and value creation for consumers, customers, and shareholders positions it well to capitalize on opportunities and weather potential challenges in the industry.
  • The company's strong cash flow generation and financial flexibility provide ample resources for future investments and shareholder returns.
  • P&G's overall financial health remains strong, but the company faces ongoing challenges related to macroeconomic volatility, competitive pressures, and regulatory compliance.
Fairly valued
Ask a question about Procter & Gamble Co. (PG)
Evaluation summary

  1. Company Overview:

    • Procter & Gamble Co. (PG) is a global leader in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) industry, focused on providing branded consumer packaged goods of superior quality and value. The company operates through five segments: Beauty, Grooming, Health Care, Fabric and Home Care, and Baby, Feminine and Family Care.
    • PG's products are sold in about 180 countries and territories, primarily through mass merchandisers, e-commerce channels, grocery stores, drug stores, and other retail outlets.
    • PG's target market is a broad consumer base across various demographics and income levels, with a focus on providing high-quality, trusted brands that meet diverse needs and preferences.
    • For comparative analysis, we will be using the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) as a benchmark and The Clorox Co. (CLX) and Colgate-Palmolive Co. (CL) as industry peers.

  2. Financial Performance:

    • PG's revenue growth has slowed in recent quarters, indicating a potential slowdown in sales growth. This slowdown is likely linked to challenging macroeconomic conditions, particularly in certain Enterprise Markets.
    • PG's profitability ratios are above the industry average, indicating a strong ability to generate profit relative to its sales, assets, and equity. However, these ratios have been declining in recent quarters, suggesting a potential need to monitor profitability trends.
    • The decline in operating income and net income is primarily driven by the Gillette impairment charge, which is a non-recurring item.
    • PG's ROA, ROE, and ROIC have been consistently above the industry average, indicating strong asset utilization and profitability. However, these ratios have also shown a declining trend in recent quarters, suggesting a potential need to monitor efficiency and profitability trends.
    • Compared to its peers, PG's profitability metrics have been mixed. While PG has outperformed CLX in the long term, it has underperformed both CLX and CL in the short term. This suggests that PG's performance is not consistently superior to its peers.

  3. Operational Efficiency:

    • PG's balance sheet analysis reveals a strong cash position and a conservative approach to debt financing. However, the company's working capital has been declining in recent quarters, suggesting a potential need to monitor liquidity and cash flow management.
    • PG's cash flow generation has been strong, providing ample financial flexibility for future investments or economic downturns. The company's capital expenditures have been decreasing, suggesting a more conservative approach to investments.
    • PG's dividend growth is expected to be sustainable, given its strong cash flow generation and commitment to shareholder returns.
    • PG's asset quality assessment indicates a significant reliance on intangible assets, which can be subject to impairment risks, as evidenced by the Gillette impairment charge.
    • PG's free cash flow trend analysis shows a strong and consistent generation of free cash flow, with a high free cash flow margin. This indicates a strong ability to generate cash flow after accounting for capital expenditures.
    • PG's capital expenditure analysis shows a declining trend in recent quarters, suggesting a more conservative approach to investments.
    • PG's dividend and share repurchase sustainability analysis indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns, supported by its robust cash flow generation.
    • Compared to its peers, PG's operational efficiency metrics have been mixed. While PG has shown a better risk-adjusted return than CLX and CL, its performance has been inconsistent, and it has underperformed its peers in some periods.
    • PG's liquidity ratios are below the industry average, indicating a relatively lower capacity to meet short-term obligations. However, P&G's strong cash flow generation and significant cash reserves provide a buffer against potential liquidity concerns.
    • PG's debt-to-equity and leverage ratios are below the industry average, indicating a lower level of financial leverage and a stronger long-term solvency position. This suggests a more conservative approach to financing and a lower risk of financial distress.

  4. Growth Opportunities:

    • PG's market expansion analysis reveals a focus on expanding its presence in emerging markets, particularly in Asia and Africa. The company is also exploring new product categories and leveraging its digital capabilities to reach new consumers.
    • PG's M&A opportunity assessment indicates a selective approach to acquisitions, focusing on strategic investments that complement its existing portfolio and enhance its competitive position.
    • PG's R&D pipeline analysis shows a strong commitment to innovation, with a focus on developing sustainable and environmentally friendly products.
    • PG's geographic expansion plan assessment indicates a focus on expanding its presence in emerging markets, particularly in Asia and Africa. The company is also exploring new product categories and leveraging its digital capabilities to reach new consumers.
    • PG's strategic focus areas include driving organic sales growth, expanding gross margins, and delivering shareholder value. The company is also focused on improving its digital capabilities, enhancing its supply chain, and reducing its environmental impact.
    • PG's progress on previously announced initiatives has been mixed. While the company has made significant progress in some areas, such as improving its digital capabilities, it has faced challenges in others, such as expanding its presence in emerging markets.
    • PG's capital allocation strategies are focused on investing in organic growth, returning capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases, and making strategic acquisitions.
    • PG's management has a history of successfully executing strategic plans, as evidenced by the company's consistent financial performance and market leadership.

  5. Risks and Threats:

    • PG faces significant market-level headwinds, including soft conditions in China and the Middle East, which are expected to continue in the first half of fiscal 2025.
    • The company is exposed to macroeconomic factors, geopolitical tensions, and government policies that can impact its global operations and financial performance.
    • Regulatory requirements related to areas like product safety, environmental protection, and data privacy continue to evolve and pose compliance risks.
    • PG faces competition from other branded products as well as retailers' private-label brands, across various price tiers.
    • PG is subject to various legal proceedings and claims related to antitrust, product liability, contracts, environmental issues, and other matters.

  6. Valuation Analysis:

    • PG's valuation metrics, such as P/E, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales, are generally in line with its peers and the industry average. However, the company's valuation has been under pressure in recent quarters, reflecting concerns about its growth prospects and the impact of macroeconomic headwinds.
    • Compared to its peers, PG's valuation metrics are mixed. While PG's P/E ratio is slightly higher than CLX's, its EV/EBITDA ratio is lower. This suggests that PG's valuation is not consistently higher or lower than its peers.
    • Potential catalysts for PG's valuation include continued innovation, expansion into emerging markets, and a rebound in consumer spending.

  7. Price Performance:

    • PG's price history analysis shows a mixed performance compared to the benchmark XLP. While PG has outperformed XLP over the longer periods of 2 years and 3 years, it has underperformed XLP over shorter periods, including the year-to-date, 1-year, 6-month, and 3-month periods. This suggests that PG's performance is less consistent than XLP's.
    • PG has provided higher annualized returns than XLP over the 2-year and 3-year periods, but lower returns over the 1-year period. However, PG has been consistently more volatile than XLP, as evidenced by its higher annualized volatility and larger maximum drawdown. This suggests that PG offers higher potential returns but also carries a higher risk profile.
    • Compared to its peers, PG's price performance has been mixed. While PG has outperformed CLX in the long term, it has underperformed both CLX and CL in the short term. This suggests that PG's performance is not consistently superior to its peers.

  8. Future Outlook:

    • PG's management guidance suggests that the company expects organic sales growth of 3-5% and core EPS growth of 5-7% in fiscal year 2025. The company anticipates commodity cost and foreign exchange headwinds of approximately $0.20 per share.
    • Analyst estimates for PG's future performance are generally in line with management guidance, with a consensus expectation for continued growth in revenue and earnings.
    • However, the company faces ongoing challenges related to macroeconomic volatility, competitive pressures, and regulatory compliance.

  9. Summary:

    • PG is a financially strong company with a long history of delivering consistent financial performance and market leadership. However, the company faces a number of challenges, including slowing revenue growth, rising costs, and macroeconomic headwinds.
    • PG's strengths include its strong brand portfolio, global reach, and commitment to innovation. However, the company's weaknesses include its reliance on intangible assets, which can be subject to impairment risks, and its exposure to macroeconomic volatility.
    • PG's opportunities include expanding its presence in emerging markets, developing new product categories, and leveraging its digital capabilities. However, the company's threats include competition from other branded products and retailers' private-label brands, as well as regulatory risks.
    • PG's valuation is generally in line with its peers and the industry average. However, the company's valuation has been under pressure in recent quarters, reflecting concerns about its growth prospects and the impact of macroeconomic headwinds.
    • PG's price performance has been mixed, with higher potential returns but also a higher risk profile. The company's performance has been less consistent than its benchmark and peers.
    • PG's future outlook is uncertain, with the company facing a number of challenges. However, the company's strong financial position, commitment to innovation, and focus on shareholder value creation suggest that it is well-positioned to navigate these challenges and deliver long-term growth.
    • Overall, PG is a financially strong company with a long history of delivering consistent financial performance and market leadership. However, the company faces a number of challenges, including slowing revenue growth, rising costs, and macroeconomic headwinds. Investors should carefully consider these factors before making any investment decisions.
Peer fundamentals 
Fundamentals
Insights
  • P&G's financial performance has been impacted by challenging macroeconomic conditions, particularly in certain Enterprise Markets.
  • The company's focus on productivity improvements, cost management, and disciplined capital allocation has enabled it to expand gross margins and maintain a strong liquidity position.
  • The Gillette impairment charge highlights the importance of closely monitoring the valuation of the company's key intangible assets.
  • P&G's commitment to innovation, brand building, and value creation for consumers, customers, and shareholders positions it well to capitalize on opportunities and weather potential challenges in the industry.
  • The company's strong cash flow generation and financial flexibility provide ample resources for future investments and shareholder returns.
  • P&G's overall financial health remains strong, but the company faces ongoing challenges related to macroeconomic volatility, competitive pressures, and regulatory compliance.
Analysis
  • Revenue - P&G's revenue growth has slowed in recent quarters, indicating a potential slowdown in sales growth. - This slowdown is likely linked to challenging macroeconomic conditions, particularly in certain Enterprise Markets. - The company's focus on innovation and brand building, as evidenced by the increase in operating expenses, suggests a commitment to long-term growth.
    • Profitability
      • P&G's profitability ratios are above the industry average, indicating a strong ability to generate profit relative to its sales, assets, and equity.
      • However, these ratios have been declining in recent quarters, suggesting a potential need to monitor profitability trends.
      • The decline in operating income and net income is primarily driven by the Gillette impairment charge, which is a non-recurring item.
    • Liquidity
      • P&G's liquidity ratios are below the industry average, indicating a relatively lower capacity to meet short-term obligations.
      • However, P&G's strong cash flow generation and significant cash reserves provide a buffer against potential liquidity concerns.
    • Solvency
      • P&G's solvency ratios are below the industry average, indicating a lower level of financial leverage and a stronger long-term solvency position.
      • This suggests a more conservative approach to financing and a lower risk of financial distress.
    • Operational Efficiency
      • P&G's efficiency ratios are above the industry average, indicating a strong ability to utilize its assets to generate revenue.
      • However, these ratios have been declining in recent quarters, suggesting a potential need to monitor efficiency trends.
    • Cash Flow Analysis
      • P&G's cash flow generation has been strong, providing ample financial flexibility for future investments or economic downturns.
      • The company's capital expenditures have been decreasing, suggesting a more conservative approach to investments.
      • P&G's dividend growth is expected to be sustainable, given its strong cash flow generation and commitment to shareholder returns.
    • Risk Factors
      • P&G faces significant market-level headwinds, including soft conditions in China and the Middle East, which are expected to continue in the first half of fiscal 2025.
      • The company is exposed to macroeconomic factors, geopolitical tensions, and government policies that can impact its global operations and financial performance.
      • Regulatory requirements related to areas like product safety, environmental protection, and data privacy continue to evolve and pose compliance risks.
    • Future Outlook
      • P&G's revenue growth is expected to remain subdued in the near term, given the challenging macroeconomic environment.
      • The company's gross margin is expected to remain stable, as it continues to focus on cost management and efficiency.
      • Operating income and net income are expected to improve in the coming quarters, as the impact of the Gillette impairment charge fades.
Most recent earnings report
Financial statements 
All public filings
Comparative Analysis
Benchmarks (as of 2024-09-27)
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP)
  • Performance Comparison: PG has shown mixed performance compared to XLP. While PG outperformed XLP over the longer periods of 2 years and 3 years, it underperformed XLP over shorter periods, including the year-to-date, 1-year, 6-month, and 3-month periods. This suggests that PG's performance is less consistent than XLP's.
  • Risk and Return Analysis: PG has provided higher annualized returns than XLP over the 2-year and 3-year periods, but lower returns over the 1-year period. However, PG has been consistently more volatile than XLP, as evidenced by its higher annualized volatility and larger maximum drawdown. This suggests that PG offers higher potential returns but also carries a higher risk profile.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance: XLP has consistently shown a higher Sharpe ratio than PG, indicating that XLP offers better risk-adjusted returns. PG's lower beta value suggests a lower risk profile than XLP, indicating that it is less sensitive to market movements.
  • Overall Assessment: PG has shown mixed performance compared to XLP, with higher potential returns but also a higher risk profile. XLP has consistently offered better risk-adjusted returns, as evidenced by its higher Sharpe ratio. PG's lower beta value suggests a lower risk profile than XLP, indicating that it is less sensitive to market movements. Investors seeking higher potential returns may consider PG, but they should be aware of the higher risk involved. Investors seeking a more stable and less volatile investment may prefer XLP.
Peers Price History(as of 2024-09-27)
The Clorox Co. (CLX)Colgate-Palmolive Co. (CL)
  • Performance Comparison: PG has exhibited a mixed performance compared to its peers, CLX and CL. While PG has outperformed CLX in the long term (2 and 3 years), it has underperformed both CLX and CL in the shorter term (1 year, 6 months, and 3 months). This suggests that PG's performance is not consistently superior to its peers.
  • Risk and Return Analysis: PG has generally provided lower annualized returns than CLX and CL, particularly in the 1-year and 2-year periods. However, PG has outperformed CLX in the 3-year period. In terms of volatility, PG has been less volatile than CLX but slightly more volatile than CL. PG's maximum drawdown of 23.77% is lower than CLX's 43.58% but higher than CL's 18.35%, indicating that PG's risk profile is moderate compared to its peers.
  • Risk-Adjusted Performance: PG has generally offered a better risk-adjusted return than CLX and CL, as evidenced by its consistently higher Sharpe ratio. This suggests that PG has been able to generate returns while taking on less risk compared to its peers. PG's beta, which is slightly higher than CLX's and CL's, indicates that it is slightly more sensitive to market movements. However, PG's beta is still below 1, suggesting that it is a relatively low-risk stock compared to the overall market.
  • Overall Assessment: PG appears to be a relatively stable and low-risk company with a moderate growth profile. While its returns have been lower than its peers in the short term, its consistent outperformance on a risk-adjusted basis (as indicated by the Sharpe ratio) suggests that it may be a suitable investment for investors seeking a balanced approach to risk and return. However, it is important to note that PG's performance has been inconsistent, and it has underperformed its peers in some periods. Investors should carefully consider their investment goals and risk tolerance before making any investment decisions.
Peers Fundamentals(as of 2024-06-30)
The Clorox Co. (CLX)Colgate-Palmolive Co. (CL)

  1. Market Position and Size:

    • PG is a dominant player in the consumer non-durables sector and the household/personal care industry, with a market cap of 402,237.0 million, significantly larger than its peers, CLX (17,924.1 million) and CL (83,923.0 million).
    • PG's market cap is strongly correlated with its revenue, EBITDA, and net income, reflecting its significantly larger scale of operations and profitability.
    • PG's size and market position within the peer group are dominant, making it a clear market leader in the household/personal care industry.

  2. Profitability and Efficiency:

    • PG consistently outperforms its peers and the industry average in terms of Gross Profit Margin, EBITDA Margin, and Net Profit Margin, demonstrating its ability to generate significant profits from its large scale of operations.
    • PG's high ROA, ROTC, and ROIC indicate its ability to generate strong returns on its assets, capital, and invested capital, highlighting its operational efficiency.

  3. Financial Health and Stability:

    • PG's overall financial health is strong, with impressive profitability, efficiency, and cash flow generation.
    • However, its liquidity position is relatively weak compared to its peers and the industry average, suggesting a potential vulnerability in its ability to meet short-term obligations.
    • PG's debt position is relatively strong compared to its peers, with a low Total Debt to Total Equity Ratio and Debt / EBITDA, indicating a lower level of debt relative to its equity and earnings.

  4. Valuation and Market Perception:

    • PG's valuation is relatively high compared to its peers and the industry average, suggesting that the market is willing to pay a premium for its size, profitability, and growth potential.
    • However, its low P/E and P/B ratios indicate that the market may be less optimistic about its future earnings growth.

  5. Cash Flow and Capital Management:

    • PG generates significantly more cash from its operations and after capital expenditures compared to its peers, demonstrating its ability to fund growth and return value to shareholders.
    • PG's high Net Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow demonstrate its ability to generate substantial cash from its operations and after capital expenditures.

  6. Growth and Future Prospects:

    • PG shows consistently higher growth in EBITDA, Net Income, Basic Earnings per Share, Free Cash Flow, and Free Cash Flow Margin compared to the peer group average, indicating that it is outperforming its peers in terms of profitability and cash flow generation.
    • PG's growth rates have been consistently increasing for EBITDA, Net Income, Basic Earnings per Share, Free Cash Flow, and Free Cash Flow Margin over the past five years, suggesting that its growth is sustainable and that it is improving its operational efficiency and profitability.
    • PG's most recent year-over-year growth rates are higher than its 5-year CAGRs for EBITDA, Net Income, Basic Earnings per Share, Free Cash Flow, and Free Cash Flow Margin, suggesting that its growth is accelerating and that it is continuing to improve its performance.
    • However, PG's sales growth has been relatively modest compared to its peers, suggesting that it may be facing challenges in expanding its market share or that its growth is being driven by price increases rather than volume growth.

  7. Potential for Investment:

    • PG's investment attractiveness is mixed. Its strong profitability, efficiency, cash flow generation, and accelerating growth rates suggest that it is a well-managed company with a strong competitive position.
    • However, its limited sales growth and relatively weak liquidity position raise concerns about its future growth potential and ability to meet short-term obligations.
    • Its valuation is also relatively high compared to its peers and the industry average, suggesting that the market is already pricing in its strong performance.

  8. Key Risks and Considerations:

    • PG's limited sales growth compared to its peers suggests that it may be facing challenges in expanding its market share or that its growth is being driven by price increases rather than volume growth.
    • PG's relatively weak liquidity position raises concerns about its ability to meet short-term obligations.
    • PG's valuation is relatively high compared to its peers and the industry average, suggesting that the market is already pricing in its strong performance.

  9. Overall Assessment:

    • PG is a financially strong company with a dominant market position and impressive profitability, efficiency, and cash flow generation.
    • However, its limited sales growth and relatively weak liquidity position raise concerns about its future growth potential and ability to meet short-term obligations.
    • Its valuation is also relatively high compared to its peers and the industry average, suggesting that the market is already pricing in its strong performance.
    • Overall, PG is a well-managed company with a strong competitive position, but investors should carefully consider its growth prospects and liquidity before making an investment decision.